MSNBC Special, February 18, 2013: HOW PRESIDENTS LIE To Get Us To “RUSH TO JUDGMENT” & Allow Them To Commit FOREIGNER GENOCIDE And Even Sacrifice Our Own Naive American Soldiers For Specious & Unmentionable Reasons. Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson & Gulf Of Tonkin, 1964; George W. Bush & Rush To War In Iraq, 2003! How The Bush Regime Used 9/11/2001 As An “Excuse” To Justify Invading Iraq, Which Had Nothing To Do With 9/11/2001 & Nothing To Do With Those Nonexistent WMD “Talking Points” Bushites Were Talking About Ad Nauseam. Guess Who The Main Facilitators Were! CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX NEWS & THE NEW YORK TIMES!




TABACCO: When we make Saints out of human beings, no matter how illustrious, no matter how talented, no matter how wealthy or successful, no matter how highly praised, no matter how elevated their office, we doom ourselves to disappointment if we ever find out the hidden truths about their darker sides.


Politicians, Athletes, Priests, Rabbis, TV personalities, Entertainers, Corporate CEOs, School Teachers, Parents, Good Samaritans & Mafioso – it matters not; the Best of us all have Secrets!


But Presidential Secrets can cause Deaths on a scale that would make Hitler proud. There is no difference between Hitler killing 6-million Jews and Bush killing 1-million Muslims – just a “Distinction”! How many Negro Slaves were murdered during the reign of George Washington? The actual numbers do not matter because 1 such death is 1 too many!









ON FEBRUARY 18, 2013


February 18, 2013


Guest: No guest



RACHEL MADDOW, HOST: Good evening. Thanks for being with us tonight.


This is a joint resolution of Congress. It was passed in 1964. The signatures here, the speaker of the House of Representatives, the president of the Senate, and down here, the big one, that is the signature of the president of the United States.


This resolution passed on a Friday. The Tuesday before, the
president had gone on TV in a live late-night urgent broadcast.




MADDOW: And in that broadcast, he said the United States Navy had come under attack. He said there had been open aggression on the high seas against the United States of America.


The result was the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. It passed in the House unanimously. It passed in the Senate 88-2.


It turns out we got snookered. It did not happen the way they said it happened, the way they so urgently and sternly informed us that it had happened. But it would be seven years before this was repealed. And by then the escalation that this levered us into had already become the longest yet war in U.S. history. A war that defined an era that indelibly tattooed the generation of political leaders who made it happen or who did not stop it from happening.


We say that Vietnam changed our politics forever. But less than 40 years after this, again, a campaign directed at the highest levels of government to get us to agree to a war based on something that did not happen the way they said it happened.


It was a month`s long campaign in 2002 and 2003, and it worked. It`s a decade now since it worked, since they got that war.


How did it work? Why did it work? And could it work again?


NBC News investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff and “Mother Jones`” David Corn, an MSNBC contributor, they co-authored a book called “Hubris” that detailed exactly how that war was sold to the American people.


What you are about to see tonight is based on their reporting.


We are still too close to all of this in time to know if what some say was the biggest foreign policy deception and disaster in modern U.S. history will define its generation of leaders too. Whether this is going to be the first line in the obituaries of the men and women who caused that war.


But if what we went through 10 years ago did not change us as a country, if we do not understand what happened and adapt as a country to resist it, then history says we are doomed to repeat it again.


Here`s what happened.


SUBTITLE: Hubris: excessive pride or self-confidence; arrogance.


“Hubris: Selling the Iraq War”


GEORGE W. BUSH, FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT: The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.


RICHARD CHENEY, FORMER U.S. VICE PRESIDENT: My belief is we will in fact be greeted as liberators.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There is a lot of money to pay for this that doesn`t have to be U.S. taxpayer money, and it starts with the assets of the Iraqi people.


DONALD RUMSFELD, FORMER U.S. DEFENSE SECRETARY: You go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have.


G. W. BUSH: The search is under way for those who are behind these evil acts. I have directed the full resources of our intelligence and law enforcement communities to find those responsible and to bring them to justice. We will make no distinction between the terrorist who committed these acts and those who harbor them.


many of us is the 9/11 attack revealed major vulnerabilities. Iraq had been a big problem even before 9/11, and became even bigger and more urgent in light of 9/11.



MADDOW (voce-over): America`s greatest national security failure since Pearl Harbor hurls its leaders into a massive national security response.

TABACCO: ”America`s greatest national security failure”? I’m going to have to inject myself into this Post because MSNBC is euphemistically giving the Bush administration the benefit of the doubt on things it cannot prove – Tabacco has no such equivocal guidelines. I call them as they really are because this stuff is obvious, even if it is un-provable.


G. W. BUSH: And the people who knock these buildings down will hear all of us soon.



MADDOW: Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist network are the immediate target. But the day after the attacks, President George W. Bush comes to the White House Situation Room and orders Counterterrorism
Director Richard Clark to look into an Iraq connection.


RICHARD CLARKE, FORMER COUNTERTERRORISM DIRECTOR: When I said, Mr. President, we will do that of course. But we`ve done it before and rather recently. And the answer has always been no. And it`s likely to be no this time.


He didn`t like that answer. And he got mad.


LISA GORDON HAGERTY, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL: I was in the room during that time, and he was very adamant about perhaps seeing whether or not Iraq could conduct such an operation against the United States.

I was surprised when the president left the room. I said I believe Secretary Wolfowitz got to him.


MADDOW: Paul Wolfowitz, Bush`s secretary of defense, has had Saddam on his personal enemies list for two decades.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Every time he survives something, he sends the message to his enemies I outlast my enemies. And if you are on the wrong list when I`m still around, you`ll be in trouble.


MICHAEL ISIKOFF, NBC NEWS: Paul Wolfowitz would become convinced that if we looked strongly enough, if we look closely enough, we`d find the hand of Saddam Hussein behind virtually every terrorist attack on the
United States.


MADDOW: Even before 9/11, Wolfowitz and Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith had been driving administration policy on Iraq.


FEITH: Some of us believed that you will have a Saddam Hussein problem forever unless you get rid of him.


MADDOW: The meeting notes from the afternoon of 9/11 showed Donald Rumsfeld tasking a top aide to find the best info fast good enough to hit Saddam Hussein. He asks the aide to get evidence from Wolfowitz of a Saddam connection with UBL, Osama bin Laden.


MARK ROSSINI, FORMER FBI AGENT: We all looked at each other like, what are they talking about? Who the hell — Saddam Hussein? Bin Laden hates him. This is a heretic. There`s no connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda.


MADDOW: The word goes out to the CIA, FBI, and all the intelligence services — find the connection.


SUBTITLE: October 7, 2001. Operation Enduring Freedom.



MADDOW: First, though, the war on terror goes to Afghanistan to capture or kill Osama bin Laden and destroy the Taliban regime that supports al Qaeda.


By November, the enemy is on the run, forced to flee into the mountains and across the boarder to Pakistan. But while bin Laden remains at large, Washington`s attention turns to Iraq, to Saddam.


RUMSFELD: I think the United States since Desert Storm has always had a various planning with respect to Iraq.



MADDOW: Operation Desert Storm, also known as the First Gulf War.


In 1991, following Iraq`s invasion of Kuwait, a U.S.-led coalition of 34 countries drives Saddam`s forces out of Kuwait and decimates the Iraqi army in six weeks.


But despite that overwhelming victory, President George H.W. Bush faces criticism at home for not going all the way to Baghdad to rid the world of Saddam Hussein.


GEORGE H.W. BUSH, FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT: I made very, very clear from day one that it was not an objective of the coalition to get Saddam Hussein out of there, by force.


MADDOW: Dick Cheney, his defense secretary at the time, supports the first President Bush`s restraint.


CHENEY: I think we got it right. Conversations I had with leaders in the region afterwards, they were concerned that we not get into a position where we were an imperialist power willy-nilly moving into capitalism in that part of the world taking down governments.


MADDOW: After the Gulf War, Bush and his successor, Bill Clinton, send U.S. planes to provide air cover for vulnerable populations in northern and southern Iraq. The U.N. Security Council imposes harsh sanctions and sends in weapons inspectors to dig deeply for Iraqi WMD capabilities, weapons of mass destruction.


CHARLES A. DUELFER, HEAD OF IRAQ SURVEY GROUP: This went on for years. At a certain point, unbeknownst to the weapons inspectors or anyone
else over in Iraq, it turns out we pretty much accounted for the full system, but we didn`t know that.


MADDOW: In 1998, Saddam refuses to cooperate further, and the United Nations pulls out the weapons inspectors.

Saddam virtually seals Iraq off from the West. In a 1998 letter to President Clinton, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, and other leading neoconservatives urge the president to take action to remove Saddam`s regime from power.


The Neocons align with urbane Iraqi expatriate named Ahmad Chalabi. Chalabi heads the Iraqi national congress, a group of Iraqi émigrés and defectors lobbying to get rid of Saddam.


AHMAD CHALABI, IRAQI EXPATRIATE: I say to you now the opposition is united in its aim of getting rid of Saddam and establishing democracy in Iraq.


FEITH: He was a very impressive and effective spokesman for the Iraqi opposition to Saddam.


PAUL PILLAR, RETIRED CIA OFFICER: A very slick operator, who was skillful enough to convey the idea that he could step in as a new leader of Iraq. But that was totally divorced from realities on the ground.


G. W. BUSH: I, George Walker Bush, do solemnly swear –


MADDOW: When George W. Bush is sworn in January 2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith take the reins of Defense Department policy.


Vice President Cheney has reversed course and now supports regime change in Iraq.


Motive awaits opportunity! And for the Bush administration, 9/11 provides it.






G. W. BUSH: Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror. This is a regime that has something to hide from the civilized world. States like these and their terrorist allies constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.

TABACCO: Notice that EVIL can never avoid HYPOCRISY! By this time in his presidency, George would have made a skilled actor!


DUELFER: When I heard the axis of evil speech —


G. W. BUSH: By keeping weapons of mass destruction.


DUELFER: — I thought, well, something is going to happen.


FEITH: The idea was take actions after 9/11 that would so shock state supporters of terrorism around the world that we might be able to get them to change their policies regarding support for terrorism and pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.


RUMSFELD: General Franks is both a warrior but also a wise and inspiring commander.


MADDOW: A declassified memo from November 2001 reveals that Donald Rumsfeld met as early as then with CENTCOM commander, General Tommy Franks,
to review plans for the decapitation of the Iraqi government. They discuss ideas of how to start a war.


One suggestion is to create a dispute over WMD inspections.

G. W. BUSH: This is a regime that agreed to international inspections, then kicked out the inspectors.


PILLAR: 9/11 made it politically possible for the first time to persuade the American people to break a tradition of not launching offensive wars.


MADDOW: The pressure to find evidence falls heavily on all 15 U.S. intelligence agencies.


PILLAR: The extremely strong policy wind that was blowing at the time and that everyone in government corridors felt made it absolutely clear what was preferred and what was not preferred.


SUBTITLE: Atta in Prague.


MADDOW: Atta, Mohamed Atta, leader of 9/11`s al Qaeda hijackings. From Prague comes a Czech intelligence report of a photograph allegedly showing Mohamed Atta meeting with a high-ranking Iraqi intelligence officer.


The photograph of the supposed meeting is never made publicly available.


ROSSINI: Mohamed Atta was a slight guy barely, what, 5`5″, 5`6″ and skinny. The guy in the photograph was muscular and thick and had a neck the size of two of my necks. And I mouthed, that`s not Mohamed Atta on the
photograph. But send to it the lab anyway. And in my mind, that matters put to bed.


CHENEY: In the final analysis —


MADDOW: But event without definitive evidence, the vice president goes public with it.


CHENEY: It`s pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April.


ROSSINI: I was sitting in my den, in home in Washington, D.C., and I remember looking at the TV screen saying, what did I just hear? And I — first time in my life, I actually threw something at the television, because I couldn`t believe what I had just heard.


SEN. CARL LEVIN (D), MICHIGAN: Over and over again, the vice president for years would say we had a report of this meeting. It`s true. There was a report. And nobody believed it. That`s what they didn`t add.




MADDOW: In a PBS interview on “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer”, national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, reveals with certainty more evidence of Saddam`s supposed terrorist link.


RICE: We know too that several of the detainees, in particular some high-ranking detainees, have said that Iraq provided some training to al Qaeda in chemical weapons development.


MADDOW: The key high-ranking detainee Rice is referring to is an al Qaeda commander named Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi.


ISIKOFF: He is at first interrogated by the FBI using standard interrogation techniques. But the CIA wants more. They seize control of him. They send him to Egypt where he is rendered and turned over to one of the most brutal intelligence services in the world.


MADDOW: This is al-Libi years later. In a Libyan prison being visited by his family. This video was recently located by Michael Isikoff.


ISIKOFF: Within weeks of his interrogation in Egypt, al-Libi coughs up this story that he hadn`t told the FBI before, that Saddam was training al Qaeda in chemical and biological weapons. It`s the single most frightening story that could have been told post-9/11.


MADDOW: Almost from the outset, the intelligence community has doubts about the claim. A 2002 CIA report states that questions persist about al-Libi`s forthrightness and truthfulness, and that in some instances he seems to have fabricated information.


After the invasion, al-Libi will recant the story that was extracted by Egypt`s brutal interrogation.


PHILIP MUDD, CIA COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER: What we said at the time was, look, he said two different things at two different times, and we will tell the policy consumers and other analysts in the community both stories.

You choose to believe what you choose to believe. But I don`t know which one is accurate.


MADDOW: The administration chooses to believe the connection.


G. W. BUSH: We`ve learned that Iraq has trained al Qaeda members in bomb making and poisons and deadly gases.


MADDOW: Right up to the war and beyond, it remains a key administration argument for war. And the public largely trusts it to be true.


DAVID CORN, MOTHER JONES: If you look at all the key pieces of evidence that they presented publicly at the time, on every single one of them, not only was there doubt, there was debate within the intelligence
agencies of the U.S. government.


MICHAEL LEITER, COMMISSION ON WMD INTELLIGENCE: The intelligence community assessed that Saddam Hussein was building a mobile biological
weapons capability to avoid detection by the U.S. and its allies. And the assessment was based almost entirely on one source from the German government, a source named Curveball.


MADDOW: His real name as far as they know is Rafid Ahmed Alwan, an Iraqi engineer who makes his way to Germany and tells German intelligence and says he worked in Saddam`s mobile weapons labs used to develop weapons
of mass destruction.


VALERIE PLAME-WILSON, FORMER CIA AGENT: In the intelligence community, Curveball was known to be a fabricator. He could not be relied upon. His intelligence was always had been sort of stamped, you know, do
not — do not disseminate. This is — this is useless.

TABACCO: If you want to discredit Mother Teresa, I’m certain you could find someone, who is either jealous of her or dislikes her enough to cast aspersions. Finding Liars, who fit that profile against Saddam Hussein, was a Slam Dunk!


MADDOW: Curveball is a lone and seriously suspect source, and U.S. intelligence agencies rely solely on German reports. They never actually question him themselves.


In this 2011 interview with Britain`s newspaper “The Guardian”, the man called Curveball confirms the lies of his pre-war claims.


REPORTER (translated): Imagine you could go back to the past and you were back in 2000 again. Would you tell lies again?


RAFID AHMED ALWAN, “CURVEBALL” (translated): Yes, yes, definitely. I would do something against Saddam against the old regime. I would do whatever was possible.


PILLAR: This particular issue about the supposed mobile labs was mishandled all the way around, certainly by the intelligence community in terms of how it was assessed, and then became the very heart of the whole case about unconventional weapons.


MADDOW: With dubious evidence like that, the White House will present its case for war.






CHENEY: The case of Saddam Hussein, a sworn enemy of our country, requires a candid appraisal of the facts.


Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt that he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.


GEN. ANTHONY ZINNI, FORMER CENTCOM COMMANDER: I had a seat at the stage next to the lectern where he was speaking. And I literally bolted at that.


CHENEY: With our help, a liberated Iraq can be a great nation once again.


MADDOW: Vice President Dick Cheney`s speech to Veterans of Foreign Wars is the opening salvo of the Bush administration`s effort to sell to the American people what White House insiders call “The Product”.


CHENEY: Thank you very much.


ZINNI: It was a shock. It was a total shock. I couldn`t believe the vice president was saying this.


And doing work with the CIA on Iraq WMD, through all the briefs I heard at Langley, I never saw one piece of credible evidence that there was an ongoing program. And that`s when I began to believe they`re getting serious about this. They want to go into Iraq.


MADDOW: Two weeks after the speech, Cheney again makes his case on national television.


CHENEY: What we know is just bits and pieces we gather through the intelligence system. But we do know with absolute certainty he is using his procurement system to acquire what he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon.


MADDOW: Saddam and nukes, absolute certainty. A terrifying prospect based on the CIA`s discovery that Iraq is attempting to purchase 60,000 aluminum tubes. Some analysts become convinced the tubes are intended to be used in centrifuges to make uranium for nuclear weapons.


Soon after the discovery, the Department of Energy gets hold of the actual tubes and asks engineering professor, Houston Wood, an expert on gas centrifuges, to evaluate them.


HOUSTON WOOD, NUCLEAR SCIENTIST: From the information they gave me, it took me about 15 minutes to come to the conclusion that these tubes could not be used for gas centrifuges. They`re too thick. They`re too heavy.


MADDOW: The Energy Department concludes that the tubes are for conventional rockets, not for nuclear weapons. But CIA analysts stick to their position that the tubes are for centrifuges, and the White House embraces that position.


Administration sources leak the disputed findings to “The New York Times” in September 2002. The paper runs its sensational scoop on the front page.


CHENEY: This is —


MADDOW: Within hours, Dick Cheney is quoting that scoop as fact on “Meet the Press.”

TABACCO: Let me get this straight – you leak Lies to The New York Times. The Times buys it and prints your Lies, then you quote The New York Times quoting your Lies, which you now portray as FACT because it appeared in The New York Times?!


Raise your hands if you trust Politicians, who want to lead us into War or anything else, for that matter!


CHENEY: It`s now public that in fact he has been seeking to acquire and we have been able to intercept and prevent him from acquiring through this particular channel the kinds of tubes that are necessary to build a centrifuge.


WOOD: I call my friends in Oakridge, and I said are these the same tubes that we were talking about last year? And they said yes. I said I thought we put that to rest a year ago.


G. W. BUSH: United Nations inspections —


MADDOW: Four days later, commemorating the first anniversary of 9/11, President George W. Bush repeats the claim at the United Nations.


G. W. BUSH: Iraq has made several attempts to buy high-strength aluminum tubes used to enrich uranium for a nuclear weapon.


BILL KELLER, EDITOR, NEW YORK TIMES, 2003-2011: I think the Bush administration took a great deal of satisfaction in being able to cite the supposedly liberal “New York Times” in making their case for it.


LEITER: Absent the aluminum tubes, most of the community believes that there is no sufficient evidence to assess that there is a nuclear program.


MADDOW: From the African country of Niger comes another nuclear alarm. Italy`s military intelligence agency informs the CIA that it has the text of a contract between Iraq and Niger for Saddam to purchase 500 metric tons of yellowcake, a form of uranium suitable for nuclear weapons.


LEITER: They were rather extensive written documents about the ways in which Iraq was negotiating to buy very significant amounts of uranium ore. But the State Department expressed how dubious they were about these
documents and the likelihood that they were forged.


MADDOW: At the time no one from U.S. intelligence had actually laid eyes on the documents, and they will ultimately turn out to be forgeries.


But when a CIA report on the yellowcake claim is presented to Dick Cheney, he orders the CIA to dig deeper. The agency sends to Niger a veteran diplomat with extensive experience in Africa, former Ambassador
Joseph Wilson.


AMB. JOSEPH WILSON: I knew the foreign minister, who was subsequently the prime minister. I knew the minister of mines.


It did not happen. It could not have happened. Just because of the nature of uranium mining operations in francophone Africa, the French maintained control.


ISIKOFF: The most important thing to know about the yellowcake story is that the CIA never believed it.


MADDOW: But even as speculation, it is enough for administration officials to move ahead with plans to take out Saddam.


National security adviser Condoleezza Rice goes on CNN to alert the nation.


RICE: The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapon. But we don`t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.


ZINNI: What I was hearing and what I knew did not jive. I asked one time at Langley, am I crazy or is there no credible evidence of an ongoing program? And I had a former deputy director of the CIA say to me, “You`re
not crazy.”


MADDOW: But there are administration voices urging caution. Secretary of State Colin Powell and his senior staff who unlike their counterparts at defense are all former military men, they press to give a chance for sanctions to work, for inspections to keep Saddam in check.


LAWRENCE WILKERSON, FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF TO COLIN POWELL: The concern was we hadn`t finished in Afghanistan, and if we went to war in Iraq, we would take the emphasis off Afghanistan, which is subsequently exactly what happened.


MADDOW: The administration has Saddam squarely in its sights. The time has come to persuade congress to squeeze the trigger.


REP. WATER JONES (R), NORTH CAROLINA: One of the most serious responsibilities the Congress has is to cast a vote to send a young man or woman to war to die.








MADDOW: With Congress back from its summer recess, administration leaders prepare to make their case to invade Iraq to eliminate Saddam.


Inside the White House, Paul Wolfowitz`s deputy, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith, an Iraq hawk like his boss, presents a slide show to national security officials that is full of questionable assertions.


LEVIN: Of all the places where intelligence was being manipulated in the Bush administration, the Feith shop was the key place.


FEITH: There was a debate about how one characterizes the relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda. Nobody made the argument that there was no relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda.


G. W. BUSH: I want to thank the —


MADDOW: The administration deploys its biggest guns to push congressional leaders for quick passage of a resolution to authorize the president to take military action.


G. W. BUSH: It`s important signal for the world to see that this country is united in our resolve to deal with threats that we face.


SEN. TOM DASCHLE (D-SD), FORMER MAJORITY LEADER: The president made the point that there was an urgency to taking action, that it couldn`t wait. He got very animated. He used uncharacteristically profanity and used the middle finger to demonstrate Saddam Hussein`s disdain for the United States and for him personally.


MADDOW: A number of members of Congress, mostly Democrats, remain unconvinced.


DASCHLE: I`m still very skeptical about Saddam Hussein`s intent and position. Nothing has changed the basis for that skepticism.


MADDOW: The Senate Intelligence Committee requests a National Intelligence Estimate, a comprehensive summary of the evidence. NIEs are routinely delivered on intelligence issues, yet on this gravest of matter, none yet exists.


In three weeks, the CIA pulls together what normally takes months.

It is delivered just seven days before the congressional vote.


GEORGE TENET, FORMER CIA DIRECTOR: Aluminum tubes are interesting, and I know there is controversy associated with it.


LEVIN: In my judgment, the CIA director George Tenet had become a political spokesperson for the administration, and that is not the role of the CIA. He was too often towing the line that the administration wanted him to tow.


TENET: We think we have stumbled on to one avenue of a nuclear weapons program.


PILLAR: There is no question that there were erroneous judgments in that National Intelligence Estimate. The purpose was to sell a policy initiative, which was to go to war against Iraq.


MADDOW: The 90-page classified NIE asserts that Saddam is actively pursuing his WMD program. It cites the debatable intelligence on aluminum tubes, the yellowcake uranium purchase, and mobile weapons labs.


But deep inside that thick document are strongly worded dissents that argue the evidence is weak, even wrong.


ISIKOFF: The NIE is sent over to Congress. It`s kept in a
classified vault. And as far as we can tell, only about a half a dozen senators actually read it. Had they done so, they would have seen that it was filled with dissents.


JONES: If I had read the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, I probably would have been — have done myself a favor by being better informed on the intelligence rather than listening to the administration.


MADDOW: As a congressional resolution to authorize war is put to a vote, most Republicans stand solidly behind President Bush.


FORMER REP. TOM DELAY (R), TEXAS: The forces of freedom are on the march and terrorists will find no safe harbor in this world.


MADDOW: Democrats are deeply divided.


FORMER SEN. TED KENNEDY (D), MASSACHUSETTS: It is wrong for congress
to declare war against Iraq now before we have exhausted the alternatives.


FORMER SEN. ROBERT BYRD (D), WEST VIRGINIA: I urge senators to go down on the Capitol Mall and look at the Vietnam Memorial.


DASCHLE: We were two months out from an election, and no one — Republican, Democrat, independent — ever wants to be viewed as weak on national security.


I will vote to give the president the authority he needs.


FORMER SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), MASSACHUSETTS: The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real.


FORMER SEN. HILLARY CLINTON (D), NEW YORK: It is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president, and we say to him — use these powers wisely and as a last resort.


JONES: In my heart, I knew that a no to the authority for the president was the right vote, but yet I was not strong enough to vote my conscience.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Joint resolution is passed without objection.


MADDOW: The vote is overwhelming. The margin is more than 3-1 in the Senate. It`s more than 2-1 in the House. The president is officially given a free hand.


G. W. BUSH: The days of Iraq acting as an outlaw state are coming to an end.


WILKERSON: Powell walked into my office, and without so much as a fare-thee-well, he walked over to the window and said I wonder what will happen when we put 500,000 troops into the Iraq and come the country from one end to the other and find nothing. And he turned around and walked back into his office.


And I wrote that down on my calendar as close to verbatim as I could, because I thought that was a profound statement comes from the secretary of state, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.


MADDOW: The march to war begins in earnest; it is Colin Powell who gets the job of selling it to the world.


COLIN POWELL, FORMER U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE: What we`re giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence.


MUDD: Anybody who says this was an intelligence-driven war I believe is mistaken, end, stop.






MADDOW: By the end of 2002, the U.S. military is headed to the Gulf.

Congress is on board, as are British Prime Minister Tony Blair and most of the mainstream media. The stage is set for war.


A new U.N. resolution has forced Iraq to submit to tough new arms inspections. But President Bush is growing impatient. The Defense Department tells him that if he is going to war, he`s got to do it before the blistering desert summer.


WILKERSON: We were moving along the path of getting a good inspection going that would probably come to fruition one way or the other.

But once you start military forces flowing to the extent that we did for Iraq, it`s hard to pull them back.


SUBTITLE: January 28, 2003. State of the Union Address.



MADDOW: As the inevitable moves closer, President Bush reargues the case and ups the ante with 16 infamous words in a State of the Union Address.


G. W. BUSH: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.


MADDOW: That would be yellowcake, again. But by referring to a six-month-old British white paper, the president does an end-run around a claim discredited by his own intelligence service.


PILLAR: It wasn`t a matter of lying about this or lying about that, but rather through the artistry of speechwriters and case presenters, conveying an impression to the American people that certain things were true.


CORN: It`s a real sleight of hand. And I think it`s kind to call that disingenuous.


MADDOW: On the heels of the president`s speech, the administration plays its ultimate trump card. It tasks Secretary of State Colin Powell, its most public trusted face, its most reluctant warrior, to make the case against Saddam Hussein at the United Nations. He is given a week to pull that presentation together.


WILKERSON: He walked into my office with a sheaf of papers in his hand and he threw them down on the desk and he said, “That`s the script of my presentation at the United Nations. It came from the vice president`s office.”


It was junk. It was pure junk. I was in charge of putting it


MADDOW: Powell and Wilkerson tear up the original 48-page script and start over with a team from the State Department and CIA.


Director George Tenet suggests they base their presentation on the National Intelligence Estimate, which unbeknownst to Powell is a deeply flawed document. Still, he is wary.


WILKERSON: We went into a room. He slammed the door shut. He said, “Sit down.” And he sat down. We were the only two people in the room. He looked at me and said this bull (EXPLETIVE DELETED) of contacts with al Qaeda has got to be taken out. It`s bull (EXPLETIVE DELETED).



And I said, I agree with you. Let`s take it out. Done. Within a half an hour, Tenet comes in and explosively tells about
this high level al Qaeda operative who has been interrogated and admitted to these contacts. Whoa! And we put it back in.


MADDOW: That would be the dubious confession extracted from Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, the result of torture by the Egyptians.


WILKERSON: Both of us convinced ourselves if the intelligence community believed what we were presenting, then we had to believe it, because they were the experts.


MUDD: I wrote parts of this speech, what I saw over the course of week, up until the night before he gave that speech, and in fact into the early morning, 1:00, 2:00 a.m., was — does this fit? Is this compelling?

Who can pick a hole in this?


I`m going to stand in front of a billion people. What I say better be deemed clearest and most credible information we have.


MADDOW: On February 5th, 2003, the moment of truth arrives.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The 4,701st meeting of the Security Council is called to order.


MADDOW: The world witnesses Colin Powell deliver the ultimate argument for war against Iraq.


POWELL: What we`re giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence. I will cite some examples, and these are from human sources.


PLAME-WILSON: I was at CIA headquarters, and all of us sort of gathered around the TV in the office to watch his speech live from the U.N.


POWELL: We have firsthand descriptions of biological weapons factories on wheels and on rails.


MADDOW: Those would be descriptions by the discredited witness Curveball.


PLAME-WILSON: As he is talking about this and showing vials of white powder and so forth, I turned to a woman next to me who had followed this whole case of Curveball much more closely than I. I said, “What the hell is going on?” And my colleague said, “I don`t know. I don`t know what`s going on. What is this?”


WILKERSON: We did not know he was in Germany. We did not know he had a code name, Curveball. We did not know that no U.S. intelligence personnel had ever interrogated him.


POWELL: Based on defector information of May 1991, Saddam Hussein had a massive clandestine program that covered several different techniques to enrich uranium.


MADDOW: That would be defector information supplied by notoriously unreliable Ahmad Chalabi, head of the Iraqi national congress, the self-appointed ex-patriot Iraqi shadow government.


DUELFER: We talked to Chalabi on multiple occasions, and we saw that they were hyping the type of information they put out.


POWELL: He is so determined that he has made repeated covert attempts to acquire high specification aluminum tubes from 11 different countries, even after inspections resumed.


MADDOW: Yet again, the aluminum tubes!


WOOD: I was incredibly disappointed when he brought out comments about the aluminum tubes. I felt betrayed as an American and a scientist.


POWELL: I can trace the story of a senior terrorist operative telling how Iraq provided training in these weapons to al Qaeda.

Fortunately, this operative is now detained. And he has told his story.


MADDOW: Powell is referring to Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, the same detainee the CIA labeled a fabricator.


Powell takes 90 minutes to run through his persuasive litany of evidence, much of it will turn out to be at best inaccurate.


POWELL: Thank you, Mr. President.


MUDD: If you look at that speech in restrictive, there is too much of what we think and not enough of we don`t know. There`s so much certitude in the speech. That`s not Secretary Powell`s problem, that`s on us as intelligence professionals.


MADDOW: Secretary of State Powell set aside his personal misgivings and staked his global reputation for integrity, on this one moment, selling the case for war.


WILKERSON: Though neither Powell nor anyone else in the State Department team intentionally lied, we did participate in a hoax.






G. W. BUSH: My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.


Our nation enters this conflict reluctantly, yet our purpose is sure.

TABACCO: More of that concomitant Hypocrisy!


MADDOW: The conquest goes quickly. And just as quickly, a country liberated from a dictator dissolves into chaos.


RUMSFELD: Freedom is untidy, and free people are free to commit mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things.


MADDOW: An administration, eager to go to war, fails disastrously to plan for its aftermath. And after 18 months of scouring the country, the truth about Saddam Hussein`s weapons of mass destruction is finally revealed.


TOM BROKAW, NBC NEWS ANCHOR: There are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and there haven`t been for a long time.


MATT LAUER, NBC NEWS ANCHOR: The new report by the chief U.S. weapons inspector finds that Iraq got rid of its weapons of mass destruction shortly after the First Gulf War.


DUELFER: I wasn`t supposed to find WMD. I was supposed to find truth. I did not fail to find WMD. I succeeded in finding the truth.


LEVIN: You`re telling us in addition to having no WMD stocks before the war for the reasons you gave, Saddam chose not to have those weapons?

Is that correct?


DUELFER: That is correct.


LEVIN: Those are stunning statements.


FEITH: It was a terrible mistake.

TABACCO: America did NOT concede to go to War in Iraq because Saddam Hussein was a “Bad Man” – we went because Bush told us Saddam was complicit in 9/11/2001 and told us Saddam consorted with Osama bin Laden, both of which were LIES!


If you justify our Iraq War as “Saving the Iraqis”, then how do you justify the deaths of so many Iraqis?


And if you justify that Iraq War as “National Security”, then please explain HOW our “National Security” was compromised or could have been compromised by Saddam Hussein! Then justify those 4,000 American Dead Heroes!


If I have omitted any other dubious, disingenuous, silly Excuses for this War, please forgive the Oversight!


POWELL: The CIA had said we would find stockpiles that we didn`t find. It was a disaster.


ANDREA MITCHELL, MSNBC ANCHOR: You believed it was true at the time?


POWELL: Yes, so did they. But they shouldn`t have. I mean, there were a lot of people in the agency, in the community, that knew that some of this information wasn`t, you know, as solid as it was being presented to


WILKERSON: It is not just an intelligence failure. It`s a failure to the highest levels of decision-making in America. George W. Bush and Richard Bruce Cheney would have gone to war with Iraq and gone to war with Iraq and gotten rid of Saddam Hussein even if there wasn`t any intelligence at all.


ZINNI: It is at worst, lies and deception. It is at best,
incompetence and lack of understanding.


CORN: A lot of people who purposely used extreme rhetoric to gin up populous support for the war, there have been no consequences for them.


LAUER: We sit here some eight years later, 4,000 Americans lost their lives, maybe 100,000 Iraqis lost their lives. (TABACCO: Try “1 Million Iraqis lost their lives!”) It cost about $1 trillion. Was it worth it? Did you give the right advice?


CHENEY: I think I did. If you look back at the proposition we faced after 9/11, with respect to Saddam Hussein, we were very concerned about the prospects of terrorists like the 9/11 crowd acquiring weapons of mass destruction, biological agent or nuclear weapon that they could use on the United States.

TABACCO: Did anyone, reading this text, really expect Cheney to give an honest answer to Lauer’s Question! (That’s rhetorical, of course)


ISIKOFF: There is no question the news media didn`t do its job during the run-up to the Iraq war. Far too often, the press simply accepted these sweeping assertions by the highest officials in the government, without looking for the hard evidence to support it.


JONES: I was more concerned about the politics in my decision, rather than what is right, and what is wrong.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I have prayed to god many times that he would forgive me for sending his children to die in a war that never had to happen.


LAUER: Was there ever any consideration of apologizing to the American people?


G. W. BUSH: I mean, apologizing would basically say the decision was a wrong decision. And I don`t believe it was a wrong decision.












This is NOT Revisionist History; this is the Truth: I NEVER believed the Bush Administration about Saddam’s Complicity in 9/11/2001.


I never believed the Bush Administration about Saddam consorting with Osama bin Laden.


Truth is I never believe the Republican Party about anything until I see absolute proof myself. I have been 99% correct using that Philosophy.


Don’t ask me to point out an example of the 1% when I was wrong and the GOP was correct because I cannot do it. I assume that Party must be correct once in awhile. If you can point out an example, I will gladly assess it and admit it if you point out correctly.


Meanwhile, I shall continue to follow my Proven Philosophy:


I never believe the Republican Party about anything until I see absolute proof myself.






I was prepared to use my boxes to designate any WHYs included in the the Special re “Why Republicans would have deliberately taken us to War with FALSE EVIDENCE, FALSE JUSTIFICATIONS & FALSE WITNESSES”. If there were any “WHY”s, I must have missed them!




Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.


Tabacco is not a blogger, who thinks; I am a Thinker, who blogs. Speaking Truth to Power!


In 1981′s ‘Body Heat’, Kathleen Turner said, “Knowledge is power”.

T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World: WTP = We The People

Subdomain re Exploited Minority Long Island community




This entry was posted in Bush, class war, compromise, deregulation, GOP, hypocrisy, knowledge is power, Obama, outsourcing, political ping pong, Politics, socialism4richcapitalism4poor, sophistry, takebackamerica, warpeace and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to MSNBC Special, February 18, 2013: HOW PRESIDENTS LIE To Get Us To “RUSH TO JUDGMENT” & Allow Them To Commit FOREIGNER GENOCIDE And Even Sacrifice Our Own Naive American Soldiers For Specious & Unmentionable Reasons. Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson & Gulf Of Tonkin, 1964; George W. Bush & Rush To War In Iraq, 2003! How The Bush Regime Used 9/11/2001 As An “Excuse” To Justify Invading Iraq, Which Had Nothing To Do With 9/11/2001 & Nothing To Do With Those Nonexistent WMD “Talking Points” Bushites Were Talking About Ad Nauseam. Guess Who The Main Facilitators Were! CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX NEWS & THE NEW YORK TIMES!

  1. admin says:

    People try to impress us with the Gravity of Hitler’s Evil by quoting the 6 Million Jews murdered by his Nazis.

    My question is this: Would Hitler have been less evil had he only murdered 3 Million Jews? How about 1 Million? How about 600,000? How about 60,000? How about 6,000? How about 600? How about 6?

    Murder and Genocide are Murder and Genocide regardless of the Totals! And – I know this will come as New Information to many Americans – but Foreign Murders by Americans are just as Horrible and Unacceptable as American Murders by Foreigners!

    Americans seem to think that 1 American Murder by a Foreigner is 1-too-many, whereas 10 Million Murders by American Soldiers of Muslims (for instance) are just Collateral Damages or Foreign Policy – we must be a little more careful!

    Is it any wonder the World sees us as UGLY AMERICANS!


  2. admin says:

    Adolf Hitler – George W. Bush – Barack Obama!

    It is hard for Tabacco to distinguish in any meaningful way the differences among those 3! It’s a case of “who writes the History Books”! Remember how Evil those Indians were to American settlers! In Truth, Scalping was too good for them! You may not approve of those sentiments; but who said you were fair-minded anyway!

    Anyone, who believes the he or she and his or hers is always Right and the other guys are always Wrong, will disagree with many of my assessments if not call me “Un-American”. Perhaps, in light of American History (rather than the Revisionist brand), being “Un-American” is NOT such a bad thing to be after all!


  3. admin says:

    Russia: Balaclava-Wearing Professors Detained in Moscow on Anniversary of Pussy Riot Protest
    Facebook_20 Twitter_20
    Reddit_20 Email_20 Addthis_20

    Russian police detained two university professors who donned balaclavas inside Moscow’s main cathedral Thursday in honor of the Russian punk group Pussy Riot. Video footage shows the women laying flowers on the altar before having their masks yanked off by security. Thursday marked the one-year anniversary of Pussy Riot’s protest inside Christ the Saviour Cathedral where they sang a “punk prayer” condemning Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Two members of the group are now serving two-year terms for the protest in remote penal colonies known for their harsh conditions. A third member, Yekaterina Samutsevich, was released on appeal. She spoke outside the church about the impact of their protest a year ago.

    Yekaterina Samutsevich: “The situation in Russia has changed. First of all, a lot of people learned about this problem. Those people who earlier didn’t pay attention to social problems, problems with the Russian Orthodox Church, problems with Putin and Patriarch Kirill, they learned about these problems, saw the huge amount of information on the Internet and television. They saw the court process, saw how we sat in the ‘aquarium’ [glass defendants’ cage], saw how much injustice happened. Now many of them are critical of Putin and the state authorities, just because of that, because they see all of this injustice.”

    TABACCO: Russia is no longer Communist; Russia is now Democratic. Russia is no longer Socialist; Russia is now Capitalistic. So why are Freedoms in Russia disappearing, and why is Repression in Russia escalating?

    It makes you wonder if perhaps we’ve been propagandized rather than informed.

    Perhaps Socialism was not so bad; perhaps Capitalism is not so good.

    Perhaps Democracy vis-a-vis Communism is more Distinction rather than Difference.

    Many of the same Social Problems now afflicting the Russian people have long since afflicted the American people.

    The Proof of the Pudding is NOT what Leaders declare it is, but rather it is what the Results indicate to the Rank & File Citizens. If it walks like a Duck, if it looks like a Duck, and if it quacks like a Duck, it is probably a Duck!

    If you cannot distinguish in Basic characteristics between what you’ve heard about Communist, Socialist Dictatorships and what you have actually experienced in a Democratic, Capitalist Republic, then the Disparities are probably more Distinction than Difference.

  4. admin says:

    So Where’s The Joke? I Don’t Get It!

    In North Korea, Dennis Rodman fouls out
    By John Avlon, CNN Contributor
    updated 3:12 PM EST, Mon March 4, 2013

    New York (CNN) — Never fear. While North Korea is a closed communist state, a rogue nuclear power that regularly threatens war and starves its own people in prison camps, Dennis Rodman has just returned from some one-on-one diplomacy with its “dear leader” Kim Jong Un and has good news to report: “I love him. The guy is awesome. He was so honest.”
    John Avlon
    John Avlon

    I’m going to go out on a limb and say this isn’t going to look much better in the eyes of history than Charles Lindbergh vouching for Hitler’s character in the late 1930s.

    But say this for the retired rebounding champion known as “The Worm” — he got closer to the young dictator by walking in the front door of North Korea with the Harlem Globetrotters and Vice magazine than diplomats and intelligence services have gotten to date. As former Assistant Secretary of State Stephen Ganyard told ABC News, “There is nobody at the CIA who could tell you more personally about Kim Jong Un than Dennis Rodman, and that in itself is scary.”

    Only PARTIALLY Republished by Tabacco – now for my Commentary:

    “Those that can do, and those that can’t teach!” You’ve heard that before, so I am reminding you of the old adage. Apparently CNN is unfamiliar with both the adage and common sense.

    Dennis Rodman, “We do the same thing here” referring to allegation of Kim Jong Un’s imprisoning 6-figure numbers of people. You know what – Dennis is dead on!

    This is just one indication of why I rarely watch CNN! Public Dismissal and CNN Ridicule does NOT a Case make – at least not to those, who think for themselves.

    I admit that Dennis Rodman is not my ideal “Diplomat”. But Dennis Rodman can travel to any country – George W. Bush and Dick Cheney cannot because some countries would ARREST BOTH ON SIGHT!

    ‘Bush, Cheney must stand trial as war criminals in Canada’
    (Tabacco: “Canada! Are you kidding! If you don’t believe me, click on URL above!”)

    George W. Bush Convicted of War Crimes, Can’t Leave U.S. Fearing Arrest
    (Tabacco: “CNN! Are you kidding! If you don’t believe me, click on URL above!”)

    George W. Bush Convicted of War Crimes, Can’t Leave U.S. Fearing Arrest
    (Tabacco: “Libertarian Review! Are you kidding! If you don’t believe me, click on URL above!”)

    So who’s the joke? Rodman or Bush-Cheney! See how the Media slants the News to fit what they want you to believe. I don’t make this stuff up! Check my Sources above if you doubt me!

    So why is CNN laughing derisively at Dennis Rodman and giving Bush-Cheney a TEFLON PASS! You tell me who is THE JOKE!

  5. admin says:

    Let’s play a VARIATION on that old TV Game Show ‘Who Do You Trust?’

    Let’s play Tabacco’s version ‘Whom Do You Distrust The Most?’

    Karzai Chides U.S. over Taliban Talks, Prison Transfer, Detainee Abuse
    Facebook_20 Twitter_20
    Reddit_20 Email_20 Addthis_20

    Tensions between the U.S. and Afghan governments are again on the rise amidst disputes over the transfer of authority and alleged abuses linked to U.S. forces. On Sunday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai said the United States and the Taliban have resumed peace talks in Qatar after they broke down last year. Karzai suggested both sides have tacitly colluded to destabilize Afghanistan to justify perpetual conflict and their long-term presence. Karzai’s comments coincided with a visit to Afghanistan by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. Hagel denied Karzai’s claims of U.S.-Taliban negotiations.

    Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel: “I told the president it was not true that the United States was unilaterally working with the Taliban in trying to negotiate anything. The fact is, any prospect for peace or political settlements, that has to be led by the Afghans.”

    Tensions further escalated over the weekend after the United States canceled plans to transfer full control of the Bagram prison to Afghan forces. The cancellation came days after Karzai criticized the United States for stalling the transfer and vowed to release many prisoners upon assuming control. The United States had previously halted a prison transfer last fall after Karzai vowed to hold trials for prisoners, rejecting U.S. demands for indefinite detention. In his rebuke of the United States on Sunday, Karzai also cited the case of an Afghan college student who claimed he was badly beaten by CIA-backed Afghan forces. The student, Abdul Qayum, says he was taken to a U.S.-run prison and repeatedly punched and whipped with a cable.

    TABACCO: I know whom I distrust the most – how about you! It’s really a SLAM DUNK for any Honest Game Player!


    Reported U.S. Drone Strike in Pakistan Kills At Least 2
    Facebook_20 Twitter_20
    Reddit_20 Email_20 Addthis_20

    An apparent U.S. drone strike in Pakistan has left at least two people dead. The attack would be the first confirmed U.S. strike in Pakistan’s North Waziristan region in two months. Last week, the Obama administration denied responsibility for a pair of strikes inside Pakistan a month ago.

    QUESTION: What other country is killing people in Middle East with Drone Strikes besides Obama’s USA?

  6. admin says:

    “Hubris” repeats on MSNBC, Friday, March 22, 2013, at 9:00pm – If you missed it before, watch it!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>