“Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald?” – PBS’ ‘Frontline’ Asks This Question: “Did Lee Harvey Oswald Act Alone, Or Was He Part Of A Vast Conspiracy?” Reminiscent Of Obama’s ‘Incomplete’ Alternatives Under ‘Dream Act’ Wherein He Excluded Option Of Punitives Against Companies That Hire Illegals, ‘Frontline’ Ignores The Distinct Possibility That Lee Was Merely A PATSY, Who Did NOT Kill Kennedy! Unless And Until ‘Frontline’ PROVES That Alternative Is Impossible, Their Entire Premise Is Prejudicial, Misleading & Unmathematical.

 

TABACCO: In mathematics, if you have two unknowns, X & Y, and you ask the question, “Is X > Y or is Y > X?”, you omit the 3rd possibility “Is X = Y?”

 

Likewise, in non-mathematical situations, you MUST include all possibilities, which have NOT been shown to be impossible. I’m afraid Sherlock Holmes would insist upon it.

 

To do what ‘Frontline’ is doing is comparable to the child, who has a nickel in one fist, but pushes the other fist forward attempting to influence you into picking the wrong fist. Bet you never thought PBS would be guilty of such Charlatanism, did you!

 

I shall not make an argument here to prove what I believe – Lee Harvey Oswald was the Patsy, and when Jack Ruby assassinated Oswald, that convinced me the Mafia was behind both assassinations.

 

In any Conspiracy to assassinate a sitting US President, if you have any hope of “getting away with it”, you MUST have a Patsy! And talent wise, Lee was rather incompetent. Only a bunch of Fools would have included him in such an endeavor. For Lee to have succeeded working alone boggles the mind.

 

PBS should answer these questions:

 

A – How did Oswald secure the job at the Dallas School Book Depository?

 

B – Who influenced Kennedy’s people to change the route of the motorcade to slow down and turn into Dealey Plaza?

 

C – Why was Oswald’s protection so lax?

 

D – Why did Jack Ruby kill Oswald?

 

E – And last, but not least, who could possibly believe the Warren Commission’s ‘Magic Bullet’ Single Gunman theory?

 

This program is scheduled for three weeks hence. I have not decided whether or not I will waste my time watching such a travesty. If you do watch, let me know what you think about these very serious OMISSIONS and which of those 5 questions PBS even attempts to investigate!

 


 

 

 

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LEE HARVEY, BUT:

 

If you love great music as I do and are unfamiliar with composer, Tomaso Albinoni, click below to hear his Adagio in G-Minor.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7Ss6YgWEts

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adagio_in_G_minor

Then read the Wikipedia Post above to find out who really wrote this marvelous, sensitive piece.

 

 

Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.

 

Tabacco is not a blogger, who thinks; I am a Thinker, who blogs. Speaking Truth to Power!

 

In 1981′s ‘Body Heat’, Kathleen Turner said, “Knowledge is power”.


T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World: WTP = We The People


 

To Read Or Write Comments On This Post, Go To:

http://tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org/?p=1866

 

To Go To The Tabacco Main Page

Listing All Posts, Go To:

www.tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org

 

To Read Posts On My Wyandanch Blog, Go To

Wyandanch Main Page:

www.wyandanch.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org

Subdomain re Exploited Minority Long Island community

 

 

 

 

COMMENTER’S BIBLE

 

Anyone may Comment here, but if you want your Comment published, you must obey the TABACCO RULES as stipulated in:

 

TABACCO’S RULES OF ENGAGEMENT! Most Comments Here Don’t Get Published. This Post Is Not Aimed At Those Charlatans; It is Intended To Edify My Veto Stance To The Intellectually Honest Readers Among You.

http://tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org/?p=180

 

 

 

 

T1673\3650

This entry was posted in Bush, class war, compromise, deregulation, disaster capitalism, GOP, hypocrisy, illicit drugs, knowledge is power, Obama, outsourcing, political ping pong, Politics, socialism4richcapitalism4poor, sophistry, takebackamerica, warpeace and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to “Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald?” – PBS’ ‘Frontline’ Asks This Question: “Did Lee Harvey Oswald Act Alone, Or Was He Part Of A Vast Conspiracy?” Reminiscent Of Obama’s ‘Incomplete’ Alternatives Under ‘Dream Act’ Wherein He Excluded Option Of Punitives Against Companies That Hire Illegals, ‘Frontline’ Ignores The Distinct Possibility That Lee Was Merely A PATSY, Who Did NOT Kill Kennedy! Unless And Until ‘Frontline’ PROVES That Alternative Is Impossible, Their Entire Premise Is Prejudicial, Misleading & Unmathematical.

  1. admin says:

    WARNING! Caveat Emptor (Let The Buyer Beware!)

    Even so revered a source as PBS is NOT above propagandizing, misinforming, distorting and in effect Lying by Omission!

    At the very least, PBS is guilty of BAD REPORTING!

    Arthur Conan Doyle’s supersleuth, Sherlock Holmes, knew how to solve a mystery. He included every possible explanation. Then he rejected those options that were impossible. And, from the mouth of Holmes himself, “Whatever is left must be the Truth!”

    The Corollary to Holmes’ Rule is that if you do not include every possibility from the beginning, your investigation is automatically FLAWED. And, if one of those omitted Possibilities is in fact the Truth, you can never find the Truth because you omitted that possibility from the inception.

    The Possibility that Lee Harvey Oswald was nothing more than a PATSY is totally discounted. Yet nobody, to my knowledge except for yours truly, has ever asked the question, “Who instigated the Kennedy motorcade to turn at the Dallas School Book Depository while slowing down to make assassination much easier?” Why not ask that question unless you are deliberately NOT TRYING TO FIND THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH!

    Tabacco

  2. admin says:

    JFK: THE SMOKING GUN – Investigative Journalism or Whitewash?

    In the very beginning, the program admits that most of America is still not buying the Warren Commission’s ‘Single Bullet Theory’ or the rest of its conclusions – that Oswald acted alone. I don’t have any evidence that he acted at all except for the gun, which would have been used if you wanted to make Oswald a patsy. Even the program admits the gun was less than efficient.

    I recorded this REELZ production. Within 4-minutes of commencement, the program asserts, “Just 45-minutes after the assassination, Kennedy’s suspected killer, Lee Harvey Oswald, murders a police officer before finally being arrested in a Dallas movie theater”. Not even a mention of the possibility that an imposter killed Tippet to further implicate Oswald in JFK’s assassination. Remember that every possibility must be exhausted to its conclusive proof of impossibility. Not on this program!

    Colin McLaren, a police detective on the Australian police force, is the show’s investigative reporter. He is both likeable and convincing. He is a marvelous tour guide, who gives a valid description of the Dallas scene.

    Within 8-minutes, he refers to the room on the 6th floor in the Dallas School Book Depository as “Oswald’s perch was much smaller, much tighter than I’d ever imagined from all of the photographs I studied. All he had to brace himself with were a couple of cardboard cartons as he fit his clunky, World War II bolt-action weapon with ammunition and took aim”.

    So 8-minutes into the show, he already has concluded that a) Oswald killed Officer Tippet and b) Oswald fired the “World War II bolt-action weapon” that killed President Kennedy. Obviously we are dealing, not only with a mental giant, but also an expert, who comes to this 60-year-old murder mystery with completely unbiased point of view, completely devoid of preconceptions. I’m sure that any Jury would be lucky to have such an unbiased Judge, Juror and Executioner.

    After 8-minutes, I wrote this comment, turned off my TV and went to bed. I did not erase the program, but neither am I convinced that I will continue viewing at a later date. McLaren’s complete lack of objectivity and obvious refusal to even consider possible Conspiracies or Lee Harvey’s possible lack of guilt convinced me that this program would be as objective as that Florida Jury that acquitted George Zimmerman of killing Trayvon Martin without cause.

    Just like the CNN rehash of the ‘Atlanta Child Murders’, this program appears less concerned with Investigative Reporting and more concerned with changing people’s Opinion about the events discussed. TV is a Propaganda tool, which places Image over Substance. And it places Viewership over anything else – including Facts.

    Tabacco

    PS I cheated! Before actually going to bed, I googled Reelz Channel and found this:

    “Reelz film says Secret Service agent was 2nd shooter” – I know you can’t wait to see this show, but I’m going to bed NOW!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>