Israel’s NUCLEAR NETANYAHU Speaks In US Congress At Invitation Of Republicans, Trying To Embarrass Obama. But Nobody – Including Our MSM – Asks Any Of These Questions: 1) Why Doesn’t Nuclear Power ISRAEL Join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty? 2) Why Is USA Covering Up The Fact Of Israel’s Nuclear Weapons? 3) Why Are Iranian Nukes Just Awful While Israeli Nukes Are Just Fine? 4) Why Does Israel Use Its Version Of Apartheid To Discriminate/Segregate Gazans Just As USA Did/Does In America’s Deep South? & 5) Why Do Both United States & Israel Have DOMINANCE AT ANY COST As Their Foreign Policies In MUSLIM OPEC MIDDLE EAST COUNTRIES?




And Chomsky is a JEW! He’s also at the Top of Tabacco’s List of Intelligent, Honest Philosophers/Thinkers/Political Analysts!


Sorry I can’t say that about those Jerks in Washington, DC, and Tel Aviv!





Note: The MSM Persistently Misspells His Name ‘Netanyahu’


What is Netanyahoo? Basically he’s just one more Politician trying to keep his plush leadership position, willing to deceive his own people and obliterate anybody else, who gets in his sights, to succeed in Politics – that’s what he is!


Did I forget to mention he’s a Sophist, a Liar, a War Monger, and a Fear Monger, who relies on nobody remembering what he said previously.


Would somebody please explain to me how Netanyahoo differs significantly from that other guy – you know the Leader of North Korea they made the film about!


Let’s see what Democracy Now! reported on Benjamin in 2012:


Netanyahu Claims Iran Approaching Nuke Advancement, 20 Years After Making Similar Claim

Facebook_20 Twitter_20
Reddit_20 Email_20 Addthis_20


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to press his case for military action against Iran despite apparent resistance from the United States. Speaking to NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, Netanyahu said Iran is close to developing the enriched uranium needed for a nuclear weapon.


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: “So I think that as they [Iran] get closer and closer and closer to the achievement of weapons-grade material — and they’re very close, they’re six months away from being about 90 percent of having the enriched uranium for an atom bomb — I think that you have to place that red line before them now, before it’s too late. We have to stop them. Don’t rely on containment. That is not the American policy. It would be wrong. It would be a grave, grave mistake. Don’t let these fanatics have nuclear weapons. It’s terrible for Israel, and it’s terrible for America. It’s terrible for the world.”


Despite his warning of a six-month window before Iran advances its alleged nuclear weapons program, this wasn’t the first time Netanyahu has made such a prediction.



In 1992 — 20 years ago — Netanyahu said that Iran was just three to five years from developing a nuclear weapon and urged U.S.-led international action to stop the purported threat.



Have you ever read the children’s story of ‘The Boy Who Cried Wolf”?


See, they misspelled his name again!


To enjoy Netanyahoo’s Rhetorical Reiterations best, please open a New Window and Click on the Link below while you read this Post: The Four Tops sing ‘It’s The Same Old Song’:


When you finished listening to the Tops, go listen to Michael sing that song ‘Ben’ – is that the same Ben we are blogging about here and now?


Jon Stewart, ‘Daily Show’, March 3, 2015, transcribed by Tabacco:


“But in the House Chamber, there was no such reflecting. Netanyahoo wrapped his speech up, and it was time for another ten minutes of applause.


Whether or not Netanyahoo achieved his goals of sabotaging a Deal with Iran, or mistakenly opened up a rift in US-Israeli relations, one thing is certain: the in-chamber response to this speech was by far the longest blow-job a Jewish man has ever received.”







I’m not going to bother repeating, reiterating and retelling how the GOP does anything and everything it can to undermine, obstruct, demean and otherwise incapacitate our President, Barack Hussein Obama!


Remember that it was the United States of America that dropped the only 2-Nukes on living people in Japan, not in Germany!


Remember that the USA supported every Dictator worth anything, so long as he did business with our Capitalists.


The Marcos hubby and wife in the Philippines!


Manuel Noriega, Panamanian Military Dictator, who is now in US, French, now Panamanian Prison(s) for Drug Trafficking, Racketeering & Money Laundering!

The US gave $400,000 to Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda in 2001 – the same year those Terrorists initiated that now famous ‘9/11’!


The US also played Footsies with Saddam Hussein until he took his ball and went to play with others, not named the USA.


And this same USA supported the Shah of Iran because, like all the other Dictators, he played the Game with American Capitalists.


Now I have introduced the Major Players in this little vignette! Let’s see what Benjamin Netanyahoo has NEW with which to enlighten us!


Monday, March 2, 2015 FULL SHOW | HEADLINES | NEXT: Noam Chomsky: Despite Iran Spat, U.S. Support for…

Noam Chomsky: Opposing Iran Nuclear Deal, Israel’s Goal Isn’t Survival — It’s Regional Dominance

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has arrived in the United States as part of his bid to stop a nuclear deal with Iran during a controversial speech before the U.S. Congress on Tuesday. Dozens of Democrats are threatening to boycott the address, which was arranged by House Speaker John Boehner without consulting the White House. Netanyahu’s visit comes just as Iran and six world powers, including the United States, are set to resume talks in a bid to meet a March 31 deadline. “For both Prime Minister Netanyahu and the hawks in Congress, mostly Republican, the primary goal is to undermine any potential negotiation that might settle whatever issue there is with Iran,” says Noam Chomsky, institute professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “They have a common interest in ensuring there is no regional force that can serve as any kind of deterrent to Israeli and U.S. violence, the major violence in the region.” Chomsky also responds to recent revelations that in 2012 the Israeli spy agency, Mossad, contradicted Netanyahu’s own dire warnings about Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear bomb, concluding that Iran was “not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons.”



This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.


AARON MATÉ: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has arrived in Washington as part of his bid to stop a nuclear deal with Iran. Netanyahu will address the lobby group AIPAC today, followed by a controversial speech before Congress on Tuesday. The visit comes just as Iran and six world powers, including the U.S., are set to resume talks in a bid to meet a March 31st deadline. At the White House, Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Netanyahu’s trip won’t threaten the outcome.


PRESSSECRETARYJOSHEARNEST: I think the short answer to that is: I don’t think so. And the reason is simply that there is a real opportunity for us here. And the president is hopeful that we are going to have an opportunity to do what is clearly in the best interests of the United States and Israel, which is to resolve the international community’s concerns about Iran’s nuclear program at the negotiating table.


AARON MATÉ: The trip has sparked the worst public rift between the U.S. and Israel in over two decades. Dozens of Democrats could boycott Netanyahu’s address to Congress, which was arranged by House Speaker John Boehner without consulting the White House. The Obama administration will send two officials, National Security Adviser Susan Rice and U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power, to address the AIPAC summit today. This comes just days after Rice called Netanyahu’s visit, quote, “destructive.”


AMYGOODMAN: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is also facing domestic criticism for his unconventional Washington visit, which comes just two weeks before an election in which he seeks a third term in Israel. On Sunday, a group representing nearly 200 of Israel’s top retired military and intelligence officials accused Netanyahu of assaulting the U.S.-Israel alliance.


But despite talk of a U.S. and Israeli dispute, the Obama administration has taken pains to display its staunch support for the Israeli government. Speaking just today in Geneva, Secretary of State John Kerry blasted the U.N. Human Rights Council for what he called an “obsession” and “bias” against Israel. The council is expected to release a report in the coming weeks on potential war crimes in Israel’s U.S.-backed Gaza assault last summer.


For more, we spend the hour today with world-renowned political dissident, linguist, author, Noam Chomsky. He has written over a hundred books, most recently On Western Terrorism: From Hiroshima to Drone Warfare. His forthcoming book, co-authored with Ilan Pappé, is titled On Palestine and will be out next month. Noam Chomsky is institute professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he’s taught for more than 50 years.


Noam Chomsky, it’s great to have you back here at Democracy Now!, and particularly in our very snowy outside, but warm inside, New York studio.


NOAMCHOMSKY: Delighted to be here again.


AMYGOODMAN: Well, Noam, let’s start with Netanyahu’s visit. He is set to make this unprecedented joint address to Congress, unprecedented because of the kind of rift it has demonstrated between the Republicans and the Democratic president, President Obama. Can you talk about its significance?


NOAMCHOMSKY: For both president—Prime Minister Netanyahu and the hawks in Congress, mostly Republican, the primary goal is to undermine any potential negotiation that might settle whatever issue there is with Iran. They have a common interest in ensuring that there is no regional force that can serve as any kind of deterrent to Israeli and U.S. violence, the major violence in the region. And it is—if we believe U.S. intelligence—don’t see any reason not to—their analysis is that if Iran is developing nuclear weapons, which they don’t know, it would be part of their deterrent strategy. Now, their general strategic posture is one of deterrence. They have low military expenditures. According to U.S. intelligence, their strategic doctrine is to try to prevent an attack, up to the point where diplomacy can set in. I don’t think anyone with a grey cell functioning thinks that they would ever conceivably use a nuclear weapon, or even try to. The country would be obliterated in 15 seconds. But they might provide a deterrent of sorts. And the U.S. and Israel certainly don’t want to tolerate that. They are the forces that carry out regular violence and aggression in the region and don’t want any impediment to that.


And for the Republicans in Congress, there’s another interest—namely, to undermine anything that Obama, you know, the entity Christ, might try to do. So that’s a separate issue there. The Republicans stopped being an ordinary parliamentary party some years ago. They were described, I think accurately, by Norman Ornstein, the very respected conservative political analyst, American Enterprise Institute; he said the party has become a radical insurgency, which has abandoned any commitment to parliamentary democracy. And their goal for the last years has simply been to undermine anything that Obama might do, in an effort to regain power and serve their primary constituency, which is the very wealthy and the corporate sector. They try to conceal this with all sorts of other means. In doing so, they’ve had to—you can’t get votes that way, so they’ve had to mobilize sectors of the population which have always been there but were never mobilized into an organized political force: evangelical Christians, extreme nationalists, terrified people who have to carry guns into Starbucks because somebody might be after them, and so on and so forth. That’s a big force. And inspiring fear is not very difficult in the United States. It’s a long history, back to colonial times, of—as an extremely frightened society, which is an interesting story in itself. And mobilizing people in fear of them, whoever “them” happens to be, is an effective technique used over and over again. And right now, the Republicans have—their nonpolicy has succeeded in putting them back in a position of at least congressional power. So, the attack on—this is a personal attack on Obama, and intended that way, is simply part of that general effort. But there is a common strategic concern underlying it, I think, and that is pretty much what U.S. intelligence analyzes: preventing any deterrent in the region to U.S. and Israeli actions.


AARON MATÉ: You say that nobody with a grey cell thinks that Iran would launch a strike, were it to have nuclear weapons, but yet Netanyahu repeatedly accuses Iran of planning a new genocide against the Jewish people. He said this most recently on Holocaust Remembrance Day in January, saying that the ayatollahs are planning a new holocaust against us. And that’s an argument that’s taken seriously here.


NOAMCHOMSKY: It’s taken seriously by people who don’t stop to think for a minute! But again, Iran is under extremely close surveillance. U.S. satellite surveillance knows everything that’s going on in Iran. If Iran even began to load a missile—that is, to bring a missile near a weapon—the country would probably be wiped out. And whatever you think about the clerics, the Guardian Council and so on, there’s no indication that they’re suicidal.


AARON MATÉ: The premise of these talks—Iran gets to enrich uranium in return for lifting of U.S. sanctions—do you see that as a fair parameter? Does the U.S. have the right, to begin with, to be imposing sanctions on Iran?


NOAMCHOMSKY: No, it doesn’t. What are the rights to impose sanctions? Iran should be imposing sanctions on us. I mean, it’s worth remembering—when you hear the White House spokesman talk about the international community, it wants Iran to do this and that, it’s important to remember that the phrase “international community” in U.S. discourse refers to the United States and anybody who may be happening to go along with it. That’s the international community. If the international community is the world, it’s quite a different story. So, two years ago, the Non-Aligned—former Non-Aligned Movement—it’s a large majority of the population of the world—had their regular conference in Iran in Tehran. And they, once again, vigorously supported Iran’s right to develop nuclear power as a signer of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. That’s the international community. The United States and its allies are outliers, as is usually the case.


And as far as sanctions are concerned, it’s worth bearing in mind that it’s now 60 years since—during the past 60 years, not a day has passed without the U.S. torturing the people of Iran. It began with overthrowing the parliamentary regime and installing a tyrant, the shah, supporting the shah through very serious human rights abuses and terror and violence. As soon as he was overthrown, almost instantly the United States turned to supporting Iraq’s attack against Iran, which was a brutal and violent attack. U.S. provided critical support for it, pretty much won the war for Iraq by entering directly at the end. After the war was over, the U.S. instantly supported the sanctions against Iran. And though this is kind of suppressed, it’s important. This is George H.W. Bush now. He was in love with Saddam Hussein. He authorized further aid to Saddam in opposition to the Treasury and others. He sent a presidential delegation—a congressional delegation to Iran. It was April 1990—1989, headed by Bob Dole, the congressional—


AMYGOODMAN: To Iraq? Sent to Iraq?


NOAMCHOMSKY: To Iraq. To Iraq, sorry, yeah—to offer his greetings to Saddam, his friend, to assure him that he should disregard critical comment that he hears in the American media: We have this free press thing here, and we can’t shut them up. But they said they would take off from Voice of America, take off critics of their friend Saddam. That was—he invited Iraqi nuclear engineers to the United States for advanced training in weapons production. This is right after the Iraq-Iran War, along with sanctions against Iran. And then it continues without a break up to the present.


There have been repeated opportunities for a settlement of whatever the issues are. And so, for example, in, I guess it was, 2010, an agreement was reached between Brazil, Turkey and Iran for Iran to ship out its low-enriched uranium for storage elsewhere—Turkey—and in return, the West would provide the isotopes that Iran needs for its medical reactors. When that agreement was reached, it was bitterly condemned in the United States by the president, by Congress, by the media. Brazil was attacked for breaking ranks and so on. The Brazilian foreign minister was sufficiently annoyed so that he released a letter from Obama to Brazil proposing exactly that agreement, presumably on the assumption that Iran wouldn’t accept it. When they did accept it, they had to be attacked for daring to accept it.


And 2012, 2012, you know, there was to be a meeting in Finland, December, to take steps towards establishing a nuclear weapons-free zone in the region. This is an old request, pushed initially by Egypt and the other Arab states back in the early ’90s. There’s so much support for it that the U.S. formally agrees, but not in fact, and has repeatedly tried to undermine it. This is under the U.N. auspices, and the meeting was supposed to take place in December. Israel announced that they would not attend. The question on everyone’s mind is: How will Iran react? They said that they would attend unconditionally. A couple of days later, Obama canceled the meeting, claiming the situation is not right for it and so on. But that would be—even steps in that direction would be an important move towards eliminating whatever issue there might be. Of course, the stumbling block is that there is one major nuclear state: Israel. And if there’s a Middle East nuclear weapons-free zone, there would be inspections, and neither Israel nor the United States will tolerate that.


AMYGOODMAN: I want to ask you about major revelations that have been described as the biggest leak since Edward Snowden. Last week, Al Jazeera started publishing a series of spy cables from the world’s top intelligence agencies. In one cable, the Israeli spy agency Mossad contradicts Prime Minister Netanyahu’s own dire warnings about Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear bomb within a year. In a report to South African counterparts in October 2012, the Israeli Mossad concluded Iran is “not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons.” The assessment was sent just weeks after Netanyahu went before the U.N. General Assembly with a far different message. Netanyahu held up a cartoonish diagram of a bomb with a fuse to illustrate what he called Iran’s alleged progress on a nuclear weapon.


PRIMEMINISTERBENJAMINNETANYAHU: This is a bomb. This is a fuse. In the case of Iran’s nuclear plans to build a bomb, this bomb has to be filled with enough enriched uranium. And Iran has to go through three stages. By next spring, at most by next summer, at current enrichment rates, they will have finished the medium enrichment and move on to the final stage. From there, it’s only a few months, possibly a few weeks, before they get enough enriched uranium for the first bomb. A red line should be drawn right here, before—before Iran completes the second stage of nuclear enrichment necessary to make a bomb.


AMYGOODMAN: That was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in September 2012. The Mossad assessment contradicting Netanyahu was sent just weeks after, but it was likely written earlier. It said Iran, quote, “does not appear to be ready,” unquote, to enrich uranium to the highest levels needed for a nuclear weapon. A bomb would require 90 percent enrichment, but Mossad found Iran had only enriched to 20 percent. That number was later reduced under an interim nuclear deal the following year. The significance of this, Noam Chomsky, as Prime Minister Netanyahu prepares for this joint address before Congress to undermine a U.S.-Iranian nuclear deal?



NOAMCHOMSKY: Well, the striking aspect of this is the chutzpah involved. I mean, Israel has had nuclear weapons for probably 50 years or 40 years. They have, estimates are, maybe 100, 200 nuclear weapons. And they are an aggressive state. Israel has invaded Lebanon five times. It’s carrying out an illegal occupation that carries out brutal attacks like Gaza last summer. And they have nuclear weapons. But the main story is that if—incidentally, the Mossad analysis corresponds to U.S. intelligence analysis. They don’t know if Iran is developing nuclear weapons. But I think the crucial fact is that even if they were, what would it mean? It would be just as U.S. intelligence analyzes it: It would be part of a deterrent strategy. They couldn’t use a nuclear weapon. They couldn’t even threaten to use it. Israel, on the other hand, can; has, in fact, threatened the use of nuclear weapons a number of times.



AMYGOODMAN: So why is Netanyahu doing this?


NOAMCHOMSKY: Because he doesn’t want to have a deterrent in the region. That’s simple enough. If you’re an aggressive, violent state, you want to be able to use force freely. You don’t want anything that might impede it.


AMYGOODMAN: Do you think this in any way has undercut the U.S. relationship with Israel, the Netanyahu-Obama conflict that, what, Susan Rice has called destructive?


NOAMCHOMSKY: There is undoubtedly a personal relationship which is hostile, but that’s happened before. Back in around 1990 under first President Bush, James Baker went as far as—the secretary of state—telling Israel, “We’re not going to talk to you anymore. If you want to contact me, here’s my phone number.” And, in fact, the U.S. imposed mild sanctions on Israel, enough to compel the prime minister to resign and be replaced by someone else. But that didn’t change the relationship, which is based on deeper issues than personal antagonisms.



Tabacco: The Jew is the best example I know demonstrating why you should NOT beat your children, why strong countries should NOT exploit, demean, commit genocide upon or inflict any other totally unfair punishment on a weaker country or people.


The Allies did it to the Germans after World War I and got Adolf Hitler, the Nazis and World War II for their overbearing Penalties & Punishments.


Throughout history the Jew has been the world’s whipping boy. Deserved or not, nobody should suffer the way Jews have suffered throughout history!


If and when that downtrodden group gains some vestige of power, it will exact retaliation upon other weaklings the way the Jews today deploy their version of Apartheid and genocide against Gaza and the Muslims within their purview.


Israel could not have achieved its dominance in the Middle East without the aid and support of the United States. Without our Foreign Aid, which is immense, their Military would be insufficient to flaunt their strength over anybody. And without our Machiavellian influence, Israel would not be a Nuclear Power. Even North Korea has signed onto the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty – Israel has not! And the United States perpetuates that Deception, pretending it has no ‘proof’ of Israeli Nukes.


I suggest our politicians Bing or Google ‘Mordechai Vanunu’ should they have any doubts about Israel being a Nuclear Power! It is no wonder that today most Americans do not believe our political leaders when they deny the existence of and their own knowledge of Extraterrestrials!


The US rationale for denying ET is somewhat argumentative, but the fact we support Israel is not. The US uses Israel to destabilize the OIL-RICH Middle East, and Israel uses the US to facilitate its own Abominations. The USA and Israel have a truly SYMBIOTIC relationship built on selfishness, exploitation and, in the case of the Israelis, REVENGE for past Transgressions!


How strange considering that the ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ was practiced nowhere on earth more ardently than in the United States. Strange Bedfellows indeed!


America even made this 1948 Oscar winning film about it, ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’!


I checked the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty members and found that IRAN has signed on!


But guess which Nuclear Powers have NOT!










Are you surprised!

That question was rhetorical of course!



Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.



If Tabacco is talking about a subject that nobody else is discussing, it means that subject is more, not less important, and the Powers-That-Be are deliberately avoiding that Issue. To presume otherwise completely defeats my purpose in blogging.



Tabacco is not a blogger, who thinks; I am a Thinker, who blogs. Speaking Truth to Power!


In 1981′s ‘Body Heat’, Kathleen Turner said, “Knowledge is power”.

T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World: WTP = We The People


To Read Comments On This Post, Go To:


To Go To The Tabacco Main Page

Listing All Posts, Go To:


To Read Posts On My Wyandanch Blog, Go To

Wyandanch Main Page:

Subdomain re Exploited Minority Long Island community







Anyone may Comment here, but if you want your Comment published, you must obey the TABACCO RULES as stipulated in:


TABACCO’S RULES OF ENGAGEMENT! Most Comments Here Don’t Get Published. This Post Is Not Aimed At Those Charlatans; It is Intended To Edify My Veto Stance To The Intellectually Honest Readers Among You.


Because of Spam, Capitalists attempting to gain Free Advertising on my Blogs and other irrelevancies, Tabacco no longer reads Comments on Posts.


Relevant Post or Post URL must appear as e-mail SUBJECT!


To register a Comment, e-mail Tabacco at:



T1724\3755 + T1625 pic

This entry was posted in Bush, class war, compromise, Democrats, deregulation, disaster capitalism, GOP, hypocrisy, illicit drugs, knowledge is power, Obama, outsourcing, political ping pong, Politics, Republicans, socialism4richcapitalism4poor, sophistry, takebackamerica, warpeace and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Israel’s NUCLEAR NETANYAHU Speaks In US Congress At Invitation Of Republicans, Trying To Embarrass Obama. But Nobody – Including Our MSM – Asks Any Of These Questions: 1) Why Doesn’t Nuclear Power ISRAEL Join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty? 2) Why Is USA Covering Up The Fact Of Israel’s Nuclear Weapons? 3) Why Are Iranian Nukes Just Awful While Israeli Nukes Are Just Fine? 4) Why Does Israel Use Its Version Of Apartheid To Discriminate/Segregate Gazans Just As USA Did/Does In America’s Deep South? & 5) Why Do Both United States & Israel Have DOMINANCE AT ANY COST As Their Foreign Policies In MUSLIM OPEC MIDDLE EAST COUNTRIES?

  1. admin says:

    Jewish Studies Scholar Cancels Univ. of Illinois Lecture over Salaita Dismissal

    A leading Jewish studies scholar has cancelled a lecture at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign over the ouster of professor Steven Salaita. The university withdrew a job offer to Salaita last year after he posted tweets harshly critical of the Israeli assault on Gaza. Todd Samuel Presner, director of the Center for Jewish Studies at UCLA, criticized university Chancellor Phyllis Wise’s insistence on “‘civility’ as the dubious touchstone for all academic discourse,” citing examples of “uncivil speech acts” by prophets in the Hebrew Bible who condemned injustice, nationalism and war.

    Republished by Tabacco

  2. admin says:

    Netanyahu Retracts Claim Hitler Was Inspired by Palestinian Cleric

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has retracted his claim a Palestinian cleric gave Hitler the idea to exterminate European Jews. Following international condemnation, including from Israeli historians, Netanyahu conceded in a Facebook post, “The decision to move from a policy of deporting Jews to the Final Solution was made by the Nazis and was not dependent on outside influence.”

    Tabacco: Netanyahoo or Netanyahu is a national leader with the Morals of a George W. Bush – that means he has no Morals! He will say anything, do anything to achieve an Advantage and get what he wants. His Public Morality is Nonexistent, and I seriously doubt his Private Morality is any better.

    He has repeatedly lied about the anticipated date of Iranian Nuclear Weapons to SCARE THE WORLD! Whatever and whenever Netanyahu says anything of note, your best course of action is to disregard it the way we all learned not to listen to George W. Bush then or now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>