“You Can’t Have It Both Ways! You Can’t Claim You Want Democracy And Then You’re The No. 1 Seller Of Arms To Those Dictatorships!” – Safa Al Ahmad. Obama’s Record Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Egypt and Iraq Fueling Unrest in Middle East – You Don’t Understand Why Muslim Terrorists Attack US? Maybe You Need To Remove Your Head From That Sand Supplied By Our Politicos & MSM!

 



http://www.democracynow.org/2015/4/7/from_bad_to_worse_hundreds_dead

 

The death toll in Yemen continues to rise amid a Saudi-led military campaign and clashes between Houthi rebels and forces loyal to ousted President Abed-Rabbo Mansour Hadi. The most intense violence is in the southern city of Aden, with more than 140 people reportedly killed in a 24-hour period. The United Nations says hundreds have been killed and more than 100,000 have been displaced since Saudi Arabia launched a military campaign two weeks ago. The Saudi regime has asked Pakistan to provide soldiers, heightening the possibility of a ground invasion. The International Committee of the Red Cross has warned of a dire humanitarian situation and demanded access to besieged areas. We are joined by the journalist Safa Al Ahmad, whose latest documentary, “The Fight for Yemen,” premieres tonight on Frontline on PBS stations nationwide. She was granted extremely rare reporting access to the Houthis as they advanced in Yemen.

 

Transcript

 

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

 

AARON MATÉ: We begin in Yemen where intense fighting to Houthi rebels and forces loyal to ousted President Abd Rabbuh Manṣūr Hādī continues to rage. The U.N. says hundreds of been killed and more than 100,000 displaced. Since Saudi Arabia launched military campaign two weeks ago. Speaking today in Geneva, U.N. officials said nearly at least 74 children have died since the Saudi strikes began.

 

CHRISTIAN LINDMEIR: Estimations from six April, as of yesterday are, 540 people have been killed and some 1700 wounded by the violence in Yemen since 19 March. Seventy-four children are known to have been known to be killed and 44 children maimed so far since the fighting began on 26 March. But we say we are aware these are conservative figures, and we believe that the total number of children killed is much higher.

 

AMY GOODMAN: The Red Cross has warned of a dire humanitarian situation and demanded access to the the sieged areas. The most intense violence is in the southern city of Aden with more than 140 people reportedly killed in a 24-hour period. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, has asked Pakistan to provide soldiers heightening the possibility of a ground invasion. For more, we’re joined by journalist Safa Al Ahmad. Her latest documentary, “The Fight for Yemen,” premiers tonight on Frontline on PBS stations across the United States. In the film, Safa was granted extremely rare access to the Houthis as they advanced in Yemen. Welcome to Democracy Now! , Safa Al Ahmad. Can you talk about the fight for Yemen and this access you had, who the Houthis are, how you followed them in Yemen?

 

SAFA AL AHMAD (Female): I have been very curious about the Houthis for years now, especially — I’ve been going to Yemen for a few years and I’ve always wanted to get that access to the Houthis. So finally, when I heard last September that they surrounded the capital Sanaa, I thought that things would escalate if they actually took over the city. They’re very interesting because they are a very young group. And they keep morphing their understanding of who they are and what they want as they progress. And so it’s very hard to pin it down to one thing. But if I must describe the Houthis in one line, it would be the revivalist Zaydis with strong anti-imperialist agenda. And so they have these really big words to describe who they are and what they want, but in reality, they want control in Yemen, and this is what they’ve done. They didn’t have enough by just controlling Sanaa, but they’ve come across most of North Yemen and reached they’ve reached Aden.

 

AARON MATÉ: And Safa, the conventional line that we hear is that they receive heavy backing from Iran. What’s your assessment of that?

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: I think that’s vastly overblown. There is very little good journalism that has been done to prove the extent of the relationship between the Houthis in Iran. I don’t doubt that there is a relationship between the Houthis and Iran, but how extensive is that? For people to blatantly call them Iranian-backed Shia militia, I think that is very, very problematic. The Houthis have local agenda; they have local grievances, and local power. The rise of the Houthis themselves had nothing to do with the Iranians. Whether they — I think there is a relationship with the Iranians and the Houthis at the moment, but not to the extent that the world claims there is for Iran. Saudi Arabia has deeper connections with Yemen. They have a large border with Yemen, and the Saudis have funded — sent money directly and arms to different groups inside Yemen. So I would argue between the two, Saudi Arabia has the much bigger influence and the upper hand in Yemen.

 

AMY GOODMAN: And talk about the role right now Saudi Arabia, what exactly is happening in Yemen on the ground, the conditions of people there? In a moment, we’re going to be speaking with an arms control expert who will talk about the Obama administration pouring more money into making more weapon sales than any administration since World War II. The largest recipient of those — of that military aid and weaponry is, of course, to Saudi Arabia.

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: Yes, I mean, record-breaking number of contracts, I think, have been sold to the Saudis in the past few years. I don’t know who they’re using them against. Yemen is a very — Yemen is the poorest Arab country. And so to have this huge alliance against Yemen for allegedly trying to break the back of the Houthis, I think it belies it, because now that the Houthis have come to Aden, which is what the airstrikes were allegedly trying to stop from happening. So the Houthis have large alliances on the ground. They didn’t — they’re not an occupying power coming from nowhere. They have been working on spreading that alliance throughout the areas that they controlled. And so the Saudi war on Yemen — Saudi-led airstrikes on Yemen — will have very limited impact on the power of the Houthis on the ground, unless there are ground troops. And even then, what is the solution? I don’t know what’s the endgame with this. I mean, the Saudis claim that it is to bring back the legitimate President Abdel Rabbo Mansour Hadi back to Yemen. But I think for a lot of Yemenis, he has lost his credibility. He has lost his legitimacy. He’s called for a war on his own people. And now he’s sitting at Riyadh. I think for a lot of people, that’s extremely problematic. The humanitarian crisis is astounding to begin with, even before this, and now with the whole air and sea embargo on Yemen, there is very little fuel, there is a food shortages. It is frightening what is happening now in Yemen and heartbreaking. The numbers that the U.N. is saying are most likely much lower than what is actually on the ground.

 

AARON MATÉ: Safa, so what do you see as the solution? Because some would say that the Houthis are also allied with a former president who also has lost credibility, Saleh. So what is the answer here?

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: Yeah, Ali Saleh, yeah. I mean, a lot of people blame Ali Saleh for all of this. He’s the one who has waged six wars against the Houthis because of his fear of their advancement. And now they’re allied together. But in the ned, I think the problem is you can’t just look at what is happening now as in today or this week in Yemen.

 

This problem has been going on for a long time. The Americans — if we’re going to specify, the Americans and their involvement in Yemen — have supported a dictator, which is Ali Saleh and even when the revolution happened to oust him in 2011, they continued to support corrupt political parties that have only their own personal interests. And the U.N. has played a detrimental part in what is happening in Yemen as well. And so all the peaceful — the civil society that had helped bring this revolution on were put to the side and only the political parties and the Americans and the U.N. and the GCC, including Saudi Arabia we’re dealing with. And so they can’t just look at the situation now in Yemen and say, oh, look what’s happening. You had a role to play in where Yemen is right now. I mean, the Americans — there was an article the other day when the Special Forces left an Al-Anad military base; they left $500 million worth of arms in the base. Who do they think has control of that now? They don’t know, probably. Yes? This is part of the really problematic American foreign policy when it comes to Yemen – this tunnel vision about antiterrorism. So whoever is the dictator in control, he is our only ally against Al Qaeda. Like that is the only problem! And the drone strikes have completely and utterly failed instead of crushing Al Qaeda. And now we hear alliances to Isis! So, I mean, the situation keeps getting from bad to worse.

 

AMY GOODMAN: Safa, before your film tonight that will be airing around the United States, “The Fight for Yemen,” you made the film “Saudi Secret Uprising” in Saudi Arabia. Can you briefly tell us about that and how it illuminates the Saudi regime?

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: I mean, I have been following the protests that have been happening in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia for a while and I finally got commissioned by the BBC to do a documentary about it. And so this is unprecedented, historic event in Saudi Arabia where there are protests consistently for over three years now. And nobody has been covering it and nobody has been talking about it, although, it’s happening within the context of all the other revolutions that were happening in the Arab world. Of course, it was in a revolution, it was an uprising and protest. Yet it goes into the whole idea of the stereotypical image of Saudi Arabia. Nobody wants to talk about the issues that are domestically happening inside the country. The protests started with, with — like a lot of the others, for example, in Libya, for freeing prisoners, political prisoners. And Instead of freeing the political prisoners, the government had increased its own detentions of the people who went out in the streets to protest. And so the escalation of demands from the protesters kept getting higher as the government continued to oppress the protests. And we can put it within the context of what is happening in the whole Middle East where the people are trying to renegotiate their relationship with their governments, and unfortunately, in the Arab world, most of them are dictatorships and they do not tolerate another voice. And then they treat them with violence. And then they are surprised with the protesters turn violent as well. And so it’s — they have created the enemy they need. They don’t want peaceful protests. They don’t want civil society. They don’t want a peaceful form of reform in the country. They just want to continue the status quo.

 

AARON MATÉ: And Safa —

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: And that goes back to Yemen as well.

 

AARON MATÉ: And Safa, in terms of that status quo, how decisive is the U.S., in your view?

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: How decisive? What do you mean?

 

AARON MATÉ: How decisive is the role of the U.S. in supporting these autocratic regimes you described? How critical is that to maintaining their power and their repression?

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: I mean, there are two things. There is an internal issue, where the people themselves have decided, like with Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, that there’s no longer any possibility for this rule to continue, then that will happen despite American intervention.

 

But that does not relieve the American foreign policy from the responsibilities they have. They’re going to pay lip service to human rights violations and them respecting democracy and them wanting these kinds of things in the Middle East, then they need to stop arming dictatorships to the teeth and then surprised when they are used against their own people. It is a really hypocritical line that the Americans are using towards the Middle East. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t claim you want democracy and then you are the number one seller of arms to those dictatorships. It’s quite problematic.

 

And think, like the news in the past couple of weeks about Sweden stopping selling weapons to Saudi Arabia because of a woman’s rights. I’m like, come on, did you just know, did you just find out that that woman didn’t have rights, that people don’t have human rights in Saudi Arabia, that they are in an oppressive regime? So I think this quite opportunistic as well in that perspective. We need to have more complex, more in-depth stories and coverage of countries like Saudi Arabia, because they play a huge role in the region. So continuing to talk about it in this really simplistic way is really detrimental to be understanding of what is actually happening on the ground.

 

AMY GOODMAN: Finally Safa Al Ahmad, as you cover the Houthi in Yemen, how did they respond to you as a Saudi journalist and filmmaker?

 

SAFA AL AHMAD: It took a lot of talking. It helped because I knew a lot of those people from before they came into power. So I have been coming to Yemen for years, and they knew me. They knew that I’ve tried to go Sadaa several times. And so I didn’t have a sudden interest in what was going on now. But even then, they were very worried about media to begin with. And it took a lot of talking, a lot of convincing. Every step of the way I needed to talk more and try to get more access. It was never at some point, like I never had carte blanche access to them. It never worked out that way. They are very, very secretive about their decision-making process, the filming of people who are involved as members. So it was a constant negotiation. I was never just given access just like that. That’s why it took so long to get that access that I did in the end.

 

AMY GOODMAN: Safa Al Ahmad, I want to thank you for being with us, Saudi journalist and filmmaker. Her latest document, “The Fight for Yemen” premieres tonight on Frontline on PBS around the United States. Safa just won a 2015 Freedom of Expression Award from the Index on Censorship for her film, “Saudi’s Secret Uprising.” This is Democracy Now! When we come back, we look at the weapon sales of the Obama administration, and then “Cowspiracy”. What does consumption of meat have to do with the drought in California? Stay with us!

 

 


http://www.democracynow.org/2015/4/7/are_obamas_record_arms_sales_to

 

Are Obama’s Record Arms Sales to

Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Egypt and Iraq

Fueling Unrest in Middle East?

 

As Saudi Arabia continues U.S.-backed strikes in Yemen and Washington lifts its freeze on military to aid to Egypt, new figures show President Obama has overseen a major increase in weapons sales since taking office. The majority of weapons exports under Obama have gone to the Middle East and Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia tops the list at $46 billion in new agreements. We are joined by William Hartung, who says that even after adjusting for inflation, “the volume of major deals concluded by the Obama administration in its first five years exceeds the amount approved by the Bush administration in its full eight years in office by nearly $30 billion. That also means that the Obama administration has approved more arms sales than any U.S. administration since World War II.” Hartung is the director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy, and author of “Prophets of War: Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military-Industrial Complex“.

 

Transcript

 

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

 

AARON MATÉ: We turn now to the major increase in U.S. arms exports under President Obama. As Saudi Arabia continues U.S.-backed strikes in Yemen and Washington lifts its freeze on military aid to Egypt, new figures show the majority of U.S. weapons exports under Obama have gone to the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia tops the list at $46 billion in new agreements. William Hartung writes that even after adjusting for inflation, “the volume of major deals concluded by the Obama administration in its first five years exceeds the amount approved by the Bush administration in its full eight years in office by nearly $30 billion.” That also means the Obama administration has approved more arms sales than any other U.S. administration since World War II.

 

AMY GOODMAN: To talk more about these figures, we’re joined now by Bill Hartung, Director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy. His latest book is, “Prophets of War: Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military-Industrial Complex.” He recently wrote an article headlined, “The Obama Arms Bazaar: Record Sales, Troubling Results.” Welcome back to Democracy Now! , Bill. Talk about the numbers. Talk about the weapons. Where are they going?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, I was astonished in researching the article that Obama had sold his much. I mean, I knew there were record deals with the Saudis, but to outsell the eight years of Bush, to sell more than any president since World War II, was surprising even to me who follow these things quite closely. The majority, 60 percent, have gone to the Persian Gulf and Middle East and within that, the Saudis have been the largest recipient of things like U.S. fighter planes, Apache attack helicopters, bombs, guns, almost an entire arsenal they’ve purchased in just the last few years.

 

AARON MATÉ: What do you think the Iran nuclear deal, if anything, portends for U.S. sales to the Middle East? President Obama’s about to call a meeting at Camp David with the leaders of all the Gulf nations. Do you see them exploiting that to call for increased U.S. military purchases from the U.S.?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Unfortunately, yes. You would think a reduction of tensions should reduce the arms sales, but the Saudis have been screaming about the deal, saying you’re letting Iran off the hook — which is not the case. Therefore, you have to bulk up our armaments, which is kind of insane given the amounts that have already gone there.

 

AMY GOODMAN*: So how does the Obama administration spending on military weapons – and is it the Obama administration spending money on military weapons – or just allowing the weapons to be sold to these countries? And how does it compare to the two terms of the George W. Bush administration?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Primarily, these are sales because the Saudis and others in the Gulf can afford them, the exceptions being aid to Egypt and Israel, which are the biggest recipients of U.S. military aid. Under Bush, they sold about $30 billion less than the $169 billion of the first five years of Obama. So already in five years, he’s outsold what Bush did in eight years.

Tabacco: To be fair, we must make allowances for Increasing Costs of Armaments since 2008 – War Profiteers always INSIST on that (No Hometown Discounts here!) However, Obama has still outdone Bush in these MALFEASANCES!

 

AMY GOODMAN: And what does this mean for war in the world?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, I think we’re seeing the results now. As mentioned in the prior segment, Saudi Arabia is using U.S. weapons to bomb Yemen, civilians have been killed, Egypt is not exactly a democratic regime, as we know. Now they’ve opened sales against them. They’ve supported dictators for many years, prior to Obama, which helped in one hand spark the Arab Spring, but also has armed the counterattacks by places like Egypt and the Saudis going into crush democracy movement and Bahrain as well as the government there. So it has been force — a negative force for many years. But I think it is spinning out of control now.

 

AARON MATÉ: And your piece also points out that it is not just U.S. arms going to regimes. When countries go haywire and into chaos like in Yemen, Iraq, and Syria, U.S. weapons in up in the hands of militants.

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Exactly! We don’t know the full numbers but in Iraq, the security forces abandoned large amounts of the weaponry to Isis. U.S. armed rebels in Syria armed by the CIA, went over to join Isis. There’s $500 million missing of weapons in Yemen. Some think it’s gone to the Houthis some think it’s gone to Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Of course there’s arms on both sides because the government and the forces have split in this war. So it’s quite possible every side of that war in Yemen may have some level of U.S. weaponry. So it’s really gone haywire. It’s sort of what I call the boomerang effect, when U.S. arms end up in the hands of U.S. adversaries.

 

AMY GOODMAN: I’d like to ask about a recent exchange between Deutsche Bank analyst Myles Walton and Lockheed Martin Chief Executive Marillyn Hewson during an earnings call in January. Financial industry analysts use earnings calls as an opportunity to ask publicly traded corporations like Lockheed about issues that might harm profitability. Hewson said that Lockheed was hoping to increase sales and that both the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region were “growth markets.”

 

MARILLYN HEWSON: Even if there may be some kind of deal that is done with Iran, there is volatility all around the region and each one of these countries believes they’ve got to protect their citizens and the things we can bring to them help in that regard. So similarly, that is the Middle East. I know that us what you asked about, but you can take that same argument to the Asia-Pacific region, which is another growth area for us. A lot of volatility, a lot of instability a lot of that are happening both with North Korea as well as some of the tensions between China and Japan. So in both of those regions, which are growth areas for us, we expect that there is going to continue to be opportunities for us to bring our capabilities to them.

 

AMY GOODMAN: During the call, Lockheed CEO Marillyn Hewson, who you were just listening to, also noted that 20 percent of Lockheed’s sales in 2014 were international, that is, to non-American customers. She added, “Lockheed has set a goal to get to 25 percent over the next few years”. Can you talk about the significance of this, Bill Hartung?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, there’s been a slight blip in Pentagon procurement. Still quite high, but the company’s need to grow constantly. And so they’re looking to up foreign sales to make up for any reductions at the Pentagon. As we heard in the clip, they’re looking to areas of conflict. And it’s not surprising, but I’m surprised that she said it so explicitly. She was asked about the Iran question, would that depress the market. She basically said, oh, there’s plenty of turbulence there, don’t worry about it, as there is in East Asia, these will be our growth markets. So she is more or less acknowledging they thrive on war and the threat of war, which is not surprising to a lot of people, but nonetheless, to say it like that, I think is a bit shocking. To just put it right out there.

 

AARON MATÉ: I want to ask you about drones. Earlier this year, the White House announced it will allow foreign allies to purchase U.S. made armed drones for the first time. Under a new policy American firms can sell their drones abroad, but will be subjected to a case-by-case review. Talk about this policy. Your were very critical of it.

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Yes! I mean, it’s got some rhetoric that makes sense. You can’t use these drones to repress your own population, for illegal surveillance, to attack you neighbors. But as we’ve seen in other cases, once they’re sold, very little control over how they are used. And given the regimes in the Persian Gulf, they’ve already sold unarmed predators, or about to, the UAE, so it’s quite possible we’ll see in the context of the war in Yemen, perhaps armed drones sold to these countries. And it’s fine to say we’re going to control their use, but the record in Iraq and Yemen and elsewhere makes that quite dubious.

 

AMY GOODMAN: As we see the Obama administration’s dramatic acceleration of U.S. weapons sales abroad, can you talk about the U.S. requirements on the licensing of weapons and weapons-related exports?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, the industry has wanted relaxation for years. The Obama administration finally delivered that. They took things from the State Department, which does a somewhat better job of vetting human rights and so forth, and took thousands of items and put them in the Commerce Department which historically has been involved in promoting arms sales, not vetting them. So it’s going to be easier for some countries to get arms without a license and those countries will become hubs of smuggling, no doubt. So it’s going to be counter to even the narrowest security interests of the United States, but it’s something industry has wanted for quite a while.

 

AARON MATÉ: On the positive side, the world’s first treaty regulating the arms trade took effect last year. The Arms Trade Treaty. The U.S. has signed it; the Senate hasn’t ratified it. But you write that that is still a positive thing.

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Yes, I think, compared to Bush, which was joined at the hip with the NRA and wouldn’t go near the Arms Trade Treaty, at least the U.S. administration signed it; although a somewhat weaker version that some of us would have liked. It commits them on paper not to sell to human rights abusers, not to let arms that may be involved in corruption. Obviously, that has been violated, in my opinion, in some of the current sales to the Middle East, but it’s a standard that they should be held to because they did sign that treaty.

 

AMY GOODMAN: So they sign the treaty and they accelerate weapons sales abroad. Would you say the — financing the weapons industry is actually a motivation for being involved in wars abroad?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: I think it’s one element. I think there is an ideological element; I think there’s an element of just U.S. global reach and global control. But, certainly, a reinforcing point is to sell arms and to help these companies. And it sometimes it is made quite explicit. When they sell to the Saudis, for example, the Pentagon points out it will create x number of jobs in the United States. So they’re not shy about talking about the jobs aspect.

 

AMY GOODMAN: So weapons industry does better under the Democrats than the Republicans?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: I would say, at the moment, they’re doing better on the arms sales front. Slightly —

 

AMY GOODMAN: And where do their contributions go?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well they tip usually depending whoever is in power. So they’re about two-thirds Republican in the Senate and the house, which is controlled by Republicans. They’re quite supportive of Obama. There’s such a flood of money from everywhere, sometimes it’s hard to follow one stream within that huge flow of money.

 

AMY GOODMAN: Well we want to thank you, Bill Hartung, for being with us. Final question, what are you recommending?

 

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well I think the Obama administration should live up to its principles on the arms trade Treaty. I think Congress should take a closer look at some of these sales, speak out against them. I think civil society groups, which oppose this, should make their voices louder because in many cases, most Americans don’t even know this is happening.

 

AMY GOODMAN: Bill Hartung is Director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy. His latest book, “Prophets of War: Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military-Industrial Complex.” We’ll link to his piece, “The Obama Arms Bazaar: Record Sales, Troubling Results.”. When we come back, we look at the drought in California. What does it have to do with animal agriculture? What does it have to do with eating meat? Stay with us!

 

Tabacco: You see, Americans, if the 6 o’clock (?)News(?) continues to

 

FOCUS ONLY ON WHAT ISLAMIC TERRORISTS ARE DOING TO US,

 

but completely disregards

 

WHAT WE DID TO PROVOKE MUSLIM TERRORISTS TO DO WHAT THEY DO,

 

then your View of Foreign Affairs is inevitably Skewed in a Pro-America/Anti-Muslim manner because our own Media only give us HALF OF THE NEWS – the HALF they want you to know!

 

What is worse is WE AMERICANS STARTED THE WHOLE DAMN THING!!!!!

 

 

The MAJOR MALEFACTORS are

United States Foreign Policy Perpetrators,

American Capitalist War Profiteers

& IGNORANT MASSES, fed LIES/HALF TRUTHS

by our own Mainstream Media!

 

 

 

Tabacco’s REPREHENSIBLE EVIL AXIOM

War & Genocide are ALWAYS EVIL

and ALWAYS REPREHENSIBLE!

But they are just as EVIL

and just as REPREHENSIBLE

when WE DO IT as they are

when IT IS DONE TO US!

 

 

So if you think Muslims are ALL BAD and Americans are ALL GOOD, you have ANOTHER THINK COMING!

 

Telling only the HALF OF THE TRUTH that BENEFITS YOU is tantamount to what?

 

 

LYING!

 

 

 

Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.

 

 

If Tabacco is talking about a subject that nobody else is discussing, it means that subject is more, not less important, and the Powers-That-Be are deliberately avoiding that Issue. To presume otherwise completely defeats my purpose in blogging.

 

 

Tabacco is not a blogger, who thinks; I am a Thinker, who blogs. Speaking Truth to Power!

 

In 1981′s ‘Body Heat’, Kathleen Turner said, “Knowledge is power”.


T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World: WTP = We The People

 

To Read Comments On This Post, Go To:

http://tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org/?p=3434

 

To Go To The Tabacco Main Page

Listing All Posts, Go To:

www.tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org

 

To Read Posts On My Wyandanch Blog, Go To

Wyandanch Main Page:

www.wyandanch.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org

Subdomain re Exploited Minority Long Island community

 

To Go To NEW CULINARY BLOG:

http://culinary.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org

 


 

COMMENTER’S BIBLE

 

Anyone may Comment here, but if you want your Comment published, you must obey the TABACCO RULES as stipulated in:

 

TABACCO’S RULES OF ENGAGEMENT! Most Comments Here Don’t Get Published. This Post Is Not Aimed At Those Charlatans; It is Intended To Edify My Veto Stance To The Intellectually Honest Readers Among You.

http://tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org/?p=180

 

Because of Spam, Capitalists attempting to gain Free Advertising on my Blogs and other irrelevancies, Tabacco no longer reads Comments on Posts.

 

Relevant Post or Post URL must appear as e-mail SUBJECT!

 

To register a Comment, e-mail Tabacco at:

contact@tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org

 

 


T1736\3771

This entry was posted in Bush, class war, compromise, Democrats, deregulation, disaster capitalism, GOP, hypocrisy, illicit drugs, knowledge is power, Obama, outsourcing, political ping pong, Politics, Republicans, socialism4richcapitalism4poor, sophistry, takebackamerica, warpeace and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to “You Can’t Have It Both Ways! You Can’t Claim You Want Democracy And Then You’re The No. 1 Seller Of Arms To Those Dictatorships!” – Safa Al Ahmad. Obama’s Record Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Egypt and Iraq Fueling Unrest in Middle East – You Don’t Understand Why Muslim Terrorists Attack US? Maybe You Need To Remove Your Head From That Sand Supplied By Our Politicos & MSM!

  1. admin says:

    THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH & NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH!

    Republicans LIE to You about Obama! Tabacco tells you the Truth, even when those Truths are Not very pretty!

    Occasionally Obama does something Good like ObamaCare (the problematic aspects were forced onto it by the Republicans, who now cry, “How awful!”)

    Then he attempts to SAVE THE WORLD by making a Deal with the Iranians to solve the potential Iranian Nuke ‘Problem’. Never mind that Israel and Netanyahoo have WMDs coming out their bazoos!

    But when Obama initiates the TransPacific Partnership or outdoes Bush in selling Arms to Dictators, you get that here too!

    I challenge any Right-Wing Blogger to make that same Claim and PROVE IT!

    Hell, there aren’t many Left-Wingers, who can stand up to “Unpleasant Truths” like I do!

    But the Good Guys in the Media (Bill Moyers is the latest) are falling by the wayside one-by-one and unremittingly!

    Pretty soon it may be just Tabacco and Democracy Now!

    The Right-Wingers are LOUDER, a lot more ubiquitous and there are so few of us left to challenge their LIES and HALF-TRUTHS! So they often win because nobody hears the Truth!

    Thank God for Democracy Now!!

    Thank God for Tabacco! (Bet you didn’t know my arms could reach around far enough to pat my own back!)

    Tabacco

  2. admin says:

    Report: German Base at the Heart of the U.S. Drone Wars

    A new report by The Intercept and Der Spiegel has revealed the U.S. military base in Ramstein, Germany, is the “high-tech heart” of the U.S. drone program. While U.S. and German officials have sought to downplay the base’s role, documents obtained from an anonymous source show the base serves as a crucial satellite relay station, beaming signals from Creech Air Force Base in Nevada to drones over Yemen, Somalia and other countries.
    http://www.democracynow.org/2015/4/20/headlines

    Republished by Tabacco

  3. admin says:

    Yemen: 36 Civilians Killed by Saudi-Led Strike on Bottling Plant

    In Yemen, a Saudi-led airstrike has killed 36 civilians working at a bottling plant in the northern governorate of Hajjah. Another attack on the Yemeni capital Sana’a hit a house and killed four civilians.

    Report: Saudi-Led Forces Used U.S.-Made Cluster Munitions in Yemen

    The latest strikes in Yemen come amid new evidence the Saudi-led forces have used cluster munitions in Yemen. Human Rights Watch said it found U.S.-made cluster munition rockets likely used in at least seven attacks in Hajjah governorate between late April and mid-July. Dozens of civilians were killed or wounded, both during the attacks and later, when they picked up unexploded submunitions that detonated. Neither the United States, Saudi Arabia or Yemen have joined the global convention banning the use of cluster munitions.

    Egypt: Al Jazeera Journalists Sentenced to 3 Years in Jail

    In Egypt, Al Jazeera journalists Mohamed Fahmy, Baher Mohamed and Peter Greste have been sentenced to three years in jail for “spreading false news” that purportedly harmed Egypt following the 2013 military coup. The three were initially arrested as part of a crackdown on Al Jazeera following the ouster of President Mohamed Morsi in 2013. Fahmy and Mohamed were led away to begin their sentences after Saturday’s verdict. Greste was tried in absentia. The sentencing came as Egypt announced it will hold long-awaited parliamentary elections in October. We’ll go to Egypt to speak with Democracy Now! correspondent Sharif Abdel Kouddous later in the broadcast.

    Syria: ISIL Destroys Part of Key Temple in Palmyra

    In Syria, the self-proclaimed Islamic State has reportedly destroyed part of the most important temple in the ancient city of Palmyra. It remains unclear how much of the 2,000-year-old Temple of Bel was destroyed by a large explosion reported in the area. ISIL has occupied Palmyra since May and recently destroyed another ancient building, the Temple of Baalshamin. The news came after Turkish warplanes joined the U.S.-led coalition against ISIL for the first time Friday, carrying out strikes in Syria.

    West Bank: Female Relatives Free Boy from Israeli Soldier

    In news from the West Bank, footage of an Israeli soldier pinning down a 12-year-old boy, while the boy’s female relatives fight to free him, has gone viral. The video and photos were taken Friday in the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh at a protest against Israeli settlements, which are considered illegal under international law. The footage shows the soldier putting Mohammed Tamimi in a headlock and pinning him down. The boy’s mother, aunt and sister scuffle with the soldier; at one point, the sister appears to bite the soldier’s hand, and he eventually releases the boy. The Israeli army said the child was throwing stones, a claim denied by witnesses.
    http://www.democracynow.org/2015/8/31/headlines

    Republished by Tabacco

  4. admin says:

    Blair Acknowledges Iraq War’s Role in Rise of ISIL

    Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair has issued a qualified apology for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, saying he’s sorry for “mistakes” made during the war, but not for the ouster of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. Blair made the comments in response to questions from CNN’s Fareed Zakaria.

    Fareed Zakaria: “When people look at the rise of ISIS, many people point to the invasion of Iraq as the principal cause. What do you say to that?”

    Tony Blair: “I think there are elements of truth in that. But I think we’ve, again, got to be extremely careful; otherwise we’ll misunderstand what’s going on in Iraq and in Syria today. Of course, you can’t say that those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015.”
    http://www.democracynow.org/2015/10/26/headlines#10265

    Tabacco: Blair doesn’t name names, but you know Tabacco will!

    Blair means the American Republican Party, which invaded Iraq for Oil & Military-Industrial Profits under FALSE PRETENSES! I don’t see how it could be any clearer! Once again CAPITALISM rears its UGLY HEAD!

    Blair comments republished by Tabacco

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>