BERNIE SANDERS On The Left & 2-Parter GOP Debate(s) Reviewed By Rachel Maddow On The Right: Stated Another Way, ‘From The Sublime To The Ridiculous!’ Bernie Vs. Hillary! Can Bernie Be First Insurgent Democrat To Defeat Establishment Candidate In Both Iowa & New Hampshire? Which Candidate Is Drawing The Biggest Crowds – Trump Or Sanders? Yet Which Candidate Has The Least Money? Donald Trump’s BIG BOO-BOO Endorsement From ‘Veterans For A Strong America’ ASTROTURF Group With 0-Members (That’s Zero Members, Folks)! Trump Was Scammed! He Should Have Googled Or Binged! What A Business Typhoon He Is! Now, Class, How Many Times Has Donald Trump Filed Corporate Bankruptcy Over 18-Year Period? The Answer Is 4: 1991, 1992, 2004, 2009. Does America Have The Time To Wait For A President Trump To Get It Right? “Oh, My Fellow Americans, I Guess I Pushed The Wrong Button This Time! There Goes Moscow! And There Goes NYC And DC! Sorry! I’ll Do Better Next Time!”


updated 9/21/2015 8:23:00 AM ET


Date: September 17, 2015
Guest: Bernie Sanders


RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: Good evening, Chris. Thank you.


And we will be keeping an eye on that as well. As Chris mentioned, a tsunami watch issued for Hawaii after that earthquake. Again, this is one of those stories where the early indications are obviously something that you want to be riveted to. The early indications can be very scary. They do not always end up being a scary thing, particularly given the direction in which these things move over the course of the — over the surface of the ocean. But we`ll watch that closely tonight and let you know as we learn more.






But I thank you for joining us tonight. Thank you for being with us. Let`s be honest, I know why you`re here. The Republican Party is hosting its second presidential candidates’ debate tonight, the second of the two debates being hosted on CNN tonight is three hours long. In the three-hour debate, the candidates are being given one bathroom break over the course of the three hours. And that comes after another two hours of a different subset of candidates who were made to debate first and separately from the larger group. So that is five straight hours of Republicans talking. And I know why you`re here. Sometimes that feels like too much Republicans’ talking.

Tabacco: I know you might think Rachel prattles on endlessly, but if you audited those GOP Debates, now you know what prattling really is! Thank God, I only listen to the ‘high points’? But fear not! I don’t get off Scott Free – I still have to edit Rachel’s text! (smile)


But in addition to the five hours of Republicans talking plan, CNN also made the strange decision to make the main event, the later of the two debates, the one that has 11 podiums on stage. they made this strange decision to pick that weird and large number of candidates for the second debate, 11. The reason they`ve got 11 candidates on stage instead of 10 candidates, which is what FOX News did for their first debate, the reason tonight they have 11 instead of 10 is because CNN broke its own debate eligibility rules, specifically to let a candidate called Carly Fiorina into tonight`s debate. Under CNN`s previous rules she would not have been there. CNN wanted her in and so they broke their own rules.

Tabacco: So much for CNN Rules!


In the first debate, Carly Fiorina was not allowed in the main event, she was at the kiddies’table with six other candidates. CNN moved her to the adult’s table tonight so today`s a big day for Carly Fiorina. I think because she`s at the big debate tonight and she`d been at the kids’ table before. really this is a bigger day for her than it is for any other candidate. This is really Carly Fiorina`s moment.

Tabacco: I slightly edited the (2 green text words above) to make it slightly funnier, but Rachel’s rather Machiavellian intent was exactly the same as my own.


And so, naturally, because that`s how it`s going this year for every candidate not named Donald Trump, because today is Carly Fiorina`s big day in the campaign, naturally a giant rainstorm just opened up over her parade.


Carly Fiorina has never held public office before. She did run once before. she ran a losing U.S. Senate campaign against Barbara Boxer in 2010. but more than that one failed run for political office, Carly Fiorina is known for having been a business leader, right? She was CEO of Hewlett- Packard for from 1999 to 2005 during which time she made a number of very controversial decisions at HP, including firing more than 30,000 people.

Tabacco: Perhaps that’s why Carly is stuck at 4%!


She herself then got fired by Hewlett-Packard`s board of directors in 2005, but it was the nice kind of firing. It was the kind of firing where they tell you, you can`t have your job but they also give you $40 million on your way out the door.

Tabacco: We should all be fired that way!


So it`s kind of this awkward foundation for her presidential candidacy, right? One state didn`t want her as a senator but now she wants the country to want her as president. She wants to run as a business leader. But to most people, firing 30,000 people and then getting fired yourself, it doesn`t seem like a great business record to run on, right? I mean, even if you were able to cash in when you did it, it just doesn`t seem like the kind of thing you want to offer the country.


Well, today being her big day, the day that Carly Fiorina is participating in the big kids` debate for the first time ever. Today, today, her old company, Hewlett-Packard, decided to remind everybody of the worst part of her business record by putting out this announcement.


Literally on the day of this debate HP announces that they are going to be firing another 30,000 people a la Carly Fiorina. And also they may be breaking the company apart. So that happening today is a nice reminder of what Carly Fiorina probably does not want people to think about when they think about her time as a business leader.


But even with that, Carly Fiorina today is better off than the boys who are still stuck at the kids` table. I mean, at least first time there was a kids` table debate when FOX News did it there were seven people at that table. It looked like a substantial number of candidates. There was a significant number of people to watch.


But between the first debate and the second debate, the kids` table went from seven people to six people to five people to four people after Jim Gilmore fell so low in the polls he didn`t even qualify to name CNN debate at all and then Rick Perry quit the presidential race altogether. And then CNN made this inexplicable decision that they were going to let 11 people instead of 10 people in the big debate so that took away another slot at the kids` table debate. And so, the kids` table tonight was really only four people and it was therefore sort of a terrible and awkward place to be for these guys in political terms.


I mean, these four guys who CNN apparently decided to organize left from tallest to shortest like a decrescendo of disappointing height — really, CNN? George Pataki is there on the tall side, or the left side of the stage. He ended up speaking a lot so that was probably good for him, more people heard George Pataki`s voice tonight than heard in the other parts of his not very impressive campaign.


In terms of the guys in the middle, Bobby Jindal and Rick Santorum both seemed frantic and urgent, but they basically stuck to all the same stuff they always say on their campaign speeches, just more of a panicky tone of voice from those two tonight.


South Carolina Lindsey Graham! he had been criticized at the last debate for being morose, one Republican observer told the “Washington Post” that in the last debate Lindsey Graham seemed like someone had quote, “just killed his dog.” Tonight Lindsey Graham tried to turn that one around by being the jokester of the kids` table.



SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I wasn`t the best law student. By the end of this debate it will be the most time I`ve ever spent in any library.



GRAHAM: We`re not going to deport 11 million people here illegally but we will start with felons and off they go. As to the rest, you can stay but you have to learn our language, I don`t speak it very well but look how far I`ve come. Speaking English is a good thing. Ronald Reagan did a couple of really big things that we should all remember. He sat down with Tip O`Neill, the most liberal guy in the entire house. They started drinking together, that`s the first thing I`m going to do as president. We`re going to drink more.



UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You`re having a good debate, but there is this problem of Washington elites and saying wonderful things about each other.


GRAHAM: I`ve been called wonderful things but never “elite” before. My dad owned a liquor store or bar in a poolroom. So only in America can you go from being in the back of the liquor store to being elite.



MADDOW: So Lindsey Graham at least brought some levity to the proceedings today. But for all these guys at the bottom of the Republican polls right now, all these guys at the kids` table tonight, they are in a pretty hopeless position. It`s possible to imagine that something might change for them in future, but right now if you add up all the support that all four of them collectively receive in the last national Republican presidential poll, all of those candidates on stage tonight, those four guys, all of them totaled combined support in the last national poll was one percent, total combined. And it was easy to add up because three of them had zero percent support in the last poll and only one of them had one.


The rest of the field, though, is not exactly a study of contrast in terms of strength. Almost everybody else running right now is stuck in single digits in every national poll. I mean, yes, it`s embarrassing to be Rick Santorum at one percent, but how much more embarrassing is that than being Jeb Bush at six percent?


It`s just numerically unavoidable right now. You have to admit that the top of the ticket on the Republican side is so dominant, Donald Trump`s huge lead is so big it`s just squeezing almost everybody else in the race out as they try to find any support.


So Ben Carson and Donald Trump are way up there at the top. But until Donald Trump in particular with his big leads, until he is cut down a little, until his lead shrinks, not only is nobody else going to have a chance to be a leader but a lot of people at the bottom of the race won`t be able to get above zero percent or one percent or two percent, and there`s going inevitably to be more and more pressure for them to get out of the race entirely just because of how badly they are failing.


The longer Donald Trump stays this far out ahead, the more not just nonviable but sometimes self-parodying it looks like for guys like Jindal and Santorum and Graham and maybe even Chris Christie and Rand Paul to be talking about themselves as the next president of the United States. I mean, the longer those guys stay at one percent because Donald Trump is up over 30 percent, the more ridiculous their odds look at the bottom of the race. And the more inevitable it feels that they will have to get out of the race and maybe soon. And even facing that sort of existential trauma,
none of his presidential opponents have been able to cut Donald Trump`s lead down at all.


But, Donald Trump is now facing two new opponents trying to cut him down from elsewhere in the political firmament, not other candidates but other big hitters in politics. The first one is happening in Iowa. It`s the largest and most influential newspaper in Iowa which, of course, is the “Des Moines Register”.


The “Des Moines Register” has previously feuded with Mr. Trump. They said after he criticized John McCain`s war record that Mr. Trump should drop out of the race. Since then the “Des Moines Register” has found its photographers and reporters frozen out of all Donald Trump Iowa events. But that`s really not causing them to back down.


Heading into tonight`s debate, the “Des Moines Register” has just run one of the most blistering editorials I have ever seen against any American politician in any state in any context, let alone a front-runner for a national Republican presidential nomination.


This is from the “Des Moines Register.” I`m not tuning this up at all. I`m not making it more hyperbolic than it is. This is actually what they published. Here`s how it starts.


Every woman has met a Donald Trump. He is the jerk at the bar, family reunion or sporting event, who disrespects women. He laughs the loudest at his own jokes and thinks the world resolves around him. He puffs up his chest and stares at yours. If you tell him to back off, he asks if you`re
menstruating. Every man has met a Trump, too, he`s the guy, who makes comments about your sister, yells out car windows and just won`t shut up.


All of just met a Donald Trump. He might be a family member, who embarrasses us regularly; he`s the person you probably don`t want to take home to mother. And the idea of that guy being seriously considered as a candidate for the president of the United States is inconceivable.


Look at that face he recently said about fellow candidate, Carly Fiorina. He called Rosie O`Donnell a slob and a pig. It doesn`t matter what`s written about you quote, ‘as long as you`ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass’, said the man seeking the job of leader of the free world.”


These are a few comments made by Donald Trump over the last several years. that an overtly sexist candidate continues to poll so well among potential caucus goers reflects negatively on all of us. It`s increasingly difficult to believe he could garner support from any male with a mother, daughter,
wife, or sister let alone support from any female. The way he talks about the opposite sex is disgraceful. Then again, maybe it`s just that time of the month for this editorial board.


I have never seen an editorial like that about a presidential candidate in Iowa. I mean, there`s a New Hampshire paper, the union leader, that`s really known and proudly known for being brutal in its editorials. Some of the New Jersey papers have prided themselves on being New Jersey crass in the way they`ve gone after Chris Christie.


But this is Iowa, and this is the biggest paper in the state. And Iowa is first in the country in terms of the presidential race. What does it mean for Donald Trump to have made an enemy this potent in a place that important? I don`t know, but I`m really interested to watch that space. That is one huge new variable in the Iowa contest.


Now, add to it this second variable. Add to that a million dollars in anti-Donald Trump ads that are going to start running in Iowa tomorrow. These ads are being run by a group called Club for Growth. Club for Growth is not an Iowa group. They`re a national group. Over the years they`ve earned a fearsome reputation in Republican circles for getting elected Republicans and candidates to vote the way the club for growth wants them to vote. Club for Growth has a very efficient system for bending Republicans to their will and it works in Congress in particular like magic.


First the Club for Growth puts out an alert telling elected Republicans how they`re supposed to vote on a specific bill up in Congress. If you`re an elected Republican, who decides to ignore that alert, if you decide to vote contrary to the way Club for Growth has told you to vote, then more than likely the Club for Growth will start running ads against you in your home district. They`ll try to bury you with a primary challenger in your own party primary. They pride themselves on essentially firing elected Republicans, who don`t toe the Club for Growth line.


So the Club for Growth, whatever you think of them, for years they have been a serious power player in Republican politics. And now that Donald Trump is the prohibitive front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, it is the Club for Growth that has stepped up to argue most aggressively against his candidacy.


This week, Club for Growth called a press conference in D.C. to unveil their new million dollar anti-Donald Trump ad campaign. And because the Club for Growth is such a heavy hitter there was anticipation about this killer punch they were about to throw against Donald Trump. Again, this is not just one of the other people running for president, this is a heavyweight Republican operation. These are big political guns being trained on Donald Trump for the first time since he has been the front-runner.


So they had their big Washington unveiling of what their big ads are going to be. They`re going to start running tomorrow in Iowa, a million dollar buy. All that anticipation, right? What will are they going to hit Donald Trump with? Nobody`s hit him like this before. What have they got on him? And I swear to you, this is what they came up with. This is how they say they`re going to stop Donald Trump.



UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The Supreme Court`s kilo decision gave government massive new power to take private property and give it to corporations. Conservatives have fought this disaster. What`s Donald Trump say about the decision?


DONALD TRUMP (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I happen to agree with it 100 percent.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Trump supports eminent domain abuse because he can make millions while we lose our property rights. Trump, the worst kind of politician!


Club for Growth action is responsible for the content of this advertising.



MADDOW: That`s it? The Club for Growth has been telegraphing they`re going to hit Donald Trump hard, they are going knock him out of the race even though nothing else could, but this is what they came up with? Donald Trump favors the Supreme Court Kilo decision from a decade ago, the Kilo decision. Which if you know case law that maybe Donald Trump wants to take your house.


In fairness, they also put out a second ad that compares Donald Trump with Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, but the Donald Trump wants yours house something is what Club for Growth is now dumping a million dollars into. These ads are going to start running tomorrow in Iowa. And who knows? Maybe they`ve struck focus group gold here. Maybe this he`s stealing your house ad resonates with Republicans more than I can get my Commie Pinko (ph) liberal brain around.


But if that`s it, if the kilo decision ad is the best they`ve got, is that the best the big money establishment power brokers and conservative politics can muster against Donald Trump, then it is looking brighter for Donald Trump now than it ever has before. That can`t really be it, can it?


There is one ray of sunshine, though, for anybody on the left or the center or the right, who wants Donald Trump to not become the Republican nominee for president of the United States, and it turns out to be something that we uncovered somewhat unexpectedly here on this show last night. That story has developed later today and particularly it has developed tonight in a way that is really, really bad for the presidential front-runner and that`s next.



MADDOW: So last night we brought you a story from the very, very top tier of Republican national politics that I almost couldn`t believe was sitting there unclaimed in plain sight. Well, today with some terrific digging, that story got even better I guess is the right word. It at least became a much bigger scandal. Stay right there, you need to hear this.





TRUMP: Boy, oh, boy, I didn`t expect that. You know Joel and the group called, and they said would you come over and speak? I`m here for a certain reason, you know, it`s called tomorrow night. So I got here and they asked a couple of days ago would it be possible to come over and say a few words. An endorsement from your group with so many veterans, hundreds of thousands of veterans, I really appreciate that, Joel. I did not expect it.



MADDOW: Hundreds of thousands of veterans, Joel!


Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump last night did a campaign event onboard a decommissioned battleship called the USS “Iowa”. We had known an event – this was going to happen. It was sort of inherently funny because Mr. Trump has no personal history of military service although he says he felt like he was in the military because he went to a military-themed prep school. He also has no expertise whatsoever on anything related to national security. And so naturally he has to go stand on a battleship right underneath the 16-inch guns.


Part of the reason that event last night got so much live national press attention is because it had been billed by the campaign as Donald Trump`s major foreign policy address. Since he`s been the Republican front-runner, Donald Trump has yet to give a policy address of any kind let alone a foreign policy address and since he`s the presidential front-runner it seemed like that was going to be a newsworthy thing. Turned out to not be a newsworthy thing, at least not for that reason. There was no foreign policy in it at all, and it frankly wasn`t even that much of a speech. What it was, was a fund-raiser. A fund-raiser for a group called Veterans for a
Strong America



TRUMP: Boy, oh, boy, I didn`t expect that. You know, Joel and the group called, and they said would you come over and speak? I`m here for a certain reason, you know; it`s called tomorrow night. So I got here and they asked a couple days ago would it be possible to say a few words. An endorsement from your group with so many veterans, hundreds of thousands of veterans, I really appreciate that, Joel. I do not expect that.



MADDOW: Let that be indelible in your mind. Donald Trump last night saying this group he was raising money for included hundreds of thousands of veterans. That does not appear to be the case. In fact, veterans for a strong America does not appear to have any members at all! If you wanted to become a member of Veterans for a Strong America, there is no way for you to join.

Tabacco: We’re talking ASTROTURF here, folks, of the ZERO MEMBER KIND!


Iraq and Afghanistan veterans of America, you want to go check them out? You go check out, check them out online, here`s how you join. You want to check out veterans of foreign wars, you go check them out, find out about them, here`s how you join. There`s no way to join this Donald Trump group, which nobody heard of before last night. And it really does appear to be just one guy, the guy in the glasses there.


The reason this fiasco of Donald Trump wrapping himself up in the mantle of veterans support and saying he`s raising money for veterans, although he is raising money for a group that doesn`t appear to represent any veterans other than its one founder. The reason this fiasco may be good political news for opponents of Donald Trump and people, who are hoping Donald Trump might eventually blow up as a presidential front-runner, is that this guy, that Donald Trump just hopped into bed with, and then his big battleship event for and raise money for and basically planted his political trump with by saying this is his legitimacy on the issue of veterans. That guy is really somebody, who Donald Trump should have Googled.

Tabacco: Perhaps Donald doesn’t know how to Google! Or perhaps one of Donald’s GOPer opponents is setting the Donald Up For A Big Fall! If that’s the case, that Opponent must reveal the whole SCAM to expose Donald’s professed BUSINESS ACUMEN is the BIGEST SCAM OF ALL!


Even if a GOPer Opponent was not behind it, that quote mistakenly attributed to P. T. Barnum was right about the Donald:


As we reported last night, the client that Mr. Joel Arends worked with on her U.S. Senate campaign in South Dakota last year, his client in that campaign just last year was later convicted on 12 election-related felonies. She says on the basis of advice given to her specifically by Donald Trump`s new friend on the battleship.


Further googling might have turned up news that Donald Trump`s new friend on the battleship was also involved in the Arizona governor`s election last year in a way that now has him under investigation by two different parts of Arizona state government including a referral for investigation to the State attorney general.


Further googling by Donald Trump or his campaign might have next turned up this rather lurid story of Donald Trump`s new friend on the battleship being part of a super PAC scam operation that apparently relieved some naive old guy in Texas of several million dollars of his own money. Pro-Publica calling it an egregious example of what can happen when people running super PACs, use super PAC contributions to basically hire themselves.


A little further Googling might have revealed that “the Associated Press” first posted today, that just last month the IRS posted this public notification that Donald Trump`s new friend on the battleship and his group Veterans for a Strong America, they just had their nonprofit status revoked officially because they haven`t filed tax returns with the IRS in at least three years.


We knew last night according to their last FEC filing this group that Donald Trump did his battleship event with, they only had $30 in the bank and about $300 of outstanding obligations. Something just didn`t seem right about Donald Trump calling this a group with hundreds of thousands of people and doing this big high profile fund-raiser for them. But now that we know more about that this group or I should say this guy, which appears to be the whole group, it now seems clear that Donald Trump and his campaign are either in on some kind of scheme with this group that is not a
nonprofit, or Donald Trump and his campaign just got duped and taken for a ride by a guy, who you could sass out pretty easily with literally one page of googling and 30 spare seconds.


In either instance, that`s the kind of base-level failure in a presidential campaign that doesn`t bode well for the long-term viability of that candidate just in terms of the basic functions of what it takes to run. Maybe Republican voters don`t care, and it doesn`t look scandalous to them. But if he keeps doing stuff like what he did with that fake veterans group on the battleship last night, the “Des Moines Register” hating his guts is going to be the least of Donald Trump`s problems in Iowa.




[21:31:40] DR. BEN CARSON (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Vaccines are very important. Certain ones, the ones that will prevent death or crippling! There are others, a multitude of vaccines, which probably don`t fit in that category and there should be some discretion in those cases.


DONALD TRUMP (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: You take this little beautiful baby and you pump, I mean, it looks just like it`s meant for a horse not for a child. And we`ve had so many instances, people that work for me just the other day, two years old, two-and-a-half years old, a child, a beautiful child went to have the vaccine and came back and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic.


I only say it`s not — I`m in favor of vaccines. Do them over a longer period of time. Same amount!


CARSON: It is true that we are probably giving way too many in too short a period of time. And a lot of pediatricians now recognize that. And I think they are cutting down on the number and the proximity in which those are done.




TRUMP: And that`s all I`m saying!


CARSON: And I think it`s appropriate.


SEN. RAND PAUL, (R-KY) PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: But I`m all for vaccines; but I`m also for freedom. I`m also a little concerned about how they`re bunched up.



RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: I don`t know who won last night`s Republican debate, but I know that the American Academy of Pediatrics thinks they lost or at least that America`s infants lost because of the anti-vaccine conspiracy theories that were put forth on last night`s debate by frontrunner Donald Trump.


And then basically supported by the two medical doctors up there on the day as well — Senator Rand Paul and Dr. Ben Carson. You could see the American Academy of Pediatrics freaking out during the debate as the candidates went down that conspiracy theory rabbit hole on vaccines.


The American Academy of Pediatrics started tweeting out, basically, no, no, no. They`ve got this wrong. Don`t listen to this! They put out a formal statement about why vaccines are important, and they don`t cause autism. They distributed a video of a pediatrician explaining why it`s important to take them on the right schedule instead of spacing them out like Dr. Trump said and the other actual doctors there last night.








So let`s turn now to the democratic frontrunner in New Hampshire, maybe in Iowa, too, Senator Bernie Sanders!


MADDOW: Joining us now for the interview is Vermont senator and Democratic candidate for president of the United States, Bernie Sanders. Senator, it`s great to have you with us here tonight!


SANDERS: Great to be with you, Rachel!


MADDOW: We talked on this show right before you got in the race, and we talked right after you jumped into the race. How do you feel now compared to then?


SANDERS: In a slight state of shock! I watch television, and I hear a lot about this guy, Bernie Sanders, and I say, “That`s an interesting guy! I`d love to meet him! Me?” That`s kind of what I feel.


I thought that we had a message that would resonate with the American people. But the truth is, it`s resonating a lot faster than I thought it would. And one of the problems we`re having now is putting together the political infrastructure, to kind of channel all of that support into constructive and effective political action. So that`s where we are right now.


MADDOW: Do you feel — and this is a little bit personal – I don`t mean it in a prying way. But this process and how much attention you`ve gotten and how much success you have had, is it energizing to you, or is it tiring and overwhelming to you?


SANDERS: It is both! I mean, it`s an unbelievable moment to go to Portland, Oregon where the Trailblazers play, you know, and look at 28,000 people, third tier, and say, “why are these guys here? Oh, I`m speaking!” That is really mind-blowing!


On the other hand, if you go through a month — 30 days — and you don`t have any days off, it gets to you a little bit. I got a day job as the United States senator from Vermont. But all in all, the kind of support that we`re getting, the kind of energy and the kind of young people that are coming out, you know, that energizes me a lot.


MADDOW: You`ve been preparing for this your whole life in some ways.



MADDOW: Let me ask you about that, what you raised there about kind of scaling up. Your campaign put out a mass hiring call earlier this week for campaign coordinators to focus on Massachusetts, Georgia, Colorado, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Vermont, Alabama, and Arkansas. All these super Tuesday states! Should we take that to mean that you think you`ve been out-organized a little bit in that state — in those states, or that you just never thought you would have to do that?


SANDERS: What you can take from that is the fact that we have put a lot of resources and energy into New Hampshire and Iowa and Nevada and South Carolina, (inaudible). And now we`re gearing up for the week after. We think we can do very, very well on super Tuesday. I think we`re going to do very well in Minnesota and Colorado and Massachusetts, and states to come, and I think we`re going to do a lot better than people think in states like South Carolina, where we`re beginning to put a lot of resources in.


MADDOW: Did you learn anything from your admittedly somewhat unexpected success in New Hampshire and Iowa that has taught you how you want to organize in new states that you`re just getting into in a more serious way now?


SANDERS: Yes. Our emphasis, what we`re doing now in Iowa, I think we have 50 or 60 people on the ground. We have people already knocking on doors. That`s what we`re doing in New Hampshire. We are obviously going to be on television and the radio with ads. But most of our emphasis is going to be at a grassroots level, just door to door, talking to people, going to meetings.


MADDOW: Getting supporters to meet each other in addition to getting the people–


SANDERS: Absolutely! One of the exciting aspects of what is happening right now is I think we have close to 200,000 volunteers.




SANDERS: And this stuff is sprouting up all over the country. I read about it in the papers. We didn`t organize it. A lot of this is spontaneous. And it`s very moving to me.


MADDOW: Can you say with confidence tonight that you definitely will be on the ballot in all 50 states? I know getting on the ballot is not an easy thing all over the country.


SANDERS: We got a guy, whose focus in life is just that. And the answer is, unless I`m very mistaken, yes. We`re in this race to win. You don`t win unless you`re on the ballot in 50 states.


MADDOW: You live tweeted last night`s debate. I read a bunch of those tweets. A little sarcasm there! A little frustration! You posted about it on Facebook. Your Facebook post about the Republican debate was the single most viewed Facebook post of any Facebook post about the debate by anyone, but that debate went on for more than three hours, had 23 million people watching. Combine it with the 24 million people who watched the first debate. Are you concerned that Republican candidates are getting that much air time, that much opportunity to articulate their ideas, that
much attention, with no equivalent for the Democratic candidates?


SANDERS: I think that is a very legitimate concern, and from day one, I didn`t think it was a good idea to limit the debates to six. Rachel, we live in a country where in the last election, 63 percent of the American people didn`t vote. My guess is a majority of the people don`t know which party controls the Senate or the House. Public consciousness is not terribly high, and debates are a means for us to get out, talk about real issues and show the difference between the candidates, but mostly talk about the need for people to be involved in the political process. Because if they`re not involved, if ordinary people are not involved, the billionaire class will continue to dominate what goes on in this country.


MADDOW: You turned out these big crowds; you inspired 200,000 volunteers. You move people. If that does not translate this year into you winning the nomination, and I hear you when you`re saying you`re in it to win it, and I believe you. If you don`t win the nomination, will you lead those people or try to inspire those people to do something else?


SANDERS: Yes. I don`t know if it`s me as a leader, but what I believe from the bottom of my heart, and I say this every time I speak to people. Let me repeat it here. Bernie Sanders cannot do it alone. Yes, I`m running to win. I want to win, and I think I can be a great president. But no president, not Bernie Sanders or anybody else, can take on Wall Street, corporate America, the corporate media, the Koch brothers, all the big money interests, unless there`s a mobilized force of millions and millions of people who stand together and say, you know what, hey, government has got to work for all of us, not just the wealthiest people in this country. That`s what I believe from the bottom of my heart.


MADDOW: We`ll be right back with more with Senator Bernie Sanders in just a moment. Stay with us.





BEN CARSON, GOP PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Vaccines are very important. Certain ones, the ones that will prevent death or crippling. There are others, a multitude of vaccines which probably don`t fit in that category, and there should be some discretion in those cases.


TRUMP: You take this little beautiful baby and you pump, I mean, it looks just like it`s meant for a horse, not for a child. And we`ve had so many instances. People that work for me just the other day, two years old, two and a half years old, a child, a beautiful child went to have the vaccine, and came back, and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic. I only say it`s not — I`m in favor of vaccines. Do them over a longer period of time. Same amount!


CARSON: It is true that we are probably giving way too many in too short a period of time. And a lot of pediatricians now recognize that. And I think are cutting down on the number and the proximity in which those are done.


TRUMP: And that`s all I`m saying.


PAUL: I`m all for vaccines, but I`m also for freedom. I`m also a little concerned about how they`re bunched up.


Tabacco: Well, folks, I hope you are all sitting down! I happen to agree with the GOP this time. At the very least we should do Studies to determine whether or not Autism is linked to (there’s that word again) IATROGENESIS! Is it the result of too many vaccines, in too short a period of time? I had the same questions and a similar problem with a couple of pet cats, each of which got a different form of cancer. In the past I never took pet cats to the Vet; they never died of Cancer either!


MADDOW: I don`t know who won last night`s Republican debate, but I know that the American Academy of Pediatrics think they lost, or at least that America`s infants lost, because of the anti-vaccine conspiracy theories that were put forth in last night`s debate by front runner Donald Trump, and then basically supported by the two medical doctors up there on the dais as well, Senator Rand Paul and Dr. Ben Carson. You can see the American Academy of Pediatrics freaking out during the debate as the candidates went down that conspiracy theory rabbit hole on vaccines. The American Academy of Pediatrics started tweeting out basically, no, no, no, they got this wrong, don`t listen to this. They put out a formal statement about why vaccines are important, and they don`t cause autism. They distributed a video of a pediatrician explaining why it`s important to take them on the right schedule, instead of spacing them out like Dr. Trump said, and the other actual doctors there last night.


So let`s turn now to the Democratic front runner in New Hampshire, and maybe in Iowa too, Senator Bernie Sanders. I want to get your reaction to that last night. That was one of the, I mean, it made me feel like last night`s Republican debate was like a public health hazard in addition to everything else it was.


SANDERS: Well, actually, over the years people of Vermont have met with me on this issue. I think the evidence is overwhelming that vaccines do not cause autism. And it really is a little bit weird for Trump, who has, as I presume, no medical background, to be raising an issue. And obviously it is a concern, because when somebody like that says it, you`re going to find thousands of people now, who are going to hesitate to give their kids the shots, and bad things may happen.


MADDOW: On terms of the relationship between Democrats and Republicans at this point in this national discussion that we`re having. Early on in the process, you and I talked about your proposal. I think it was back in June, that Democrats and Republicans should start debating each other now. Even before the Republican primary process is done. Are you still into that idea?


SANDERS: Absolutely! I think the more debates, the merrier. I`ll tell you what I think. I think that Republicans get away with murder because they are never challenged. Last night — I have to tell you, I did quit after two and a half hours. The energy was just sucked out of my body. I was exhausted watching this stuff.


In terms of the major issues facing America, did you hear one word from anybody who said, well, you know, climate change is a real threat to the planet; we need bold action? No!


Did you hear one person say, well, the real value of the minimum wage has declined significantly over the years! we need to raise the minimum wage? No!


Did you hear one person say one word about 30 million Americans not having any health insurance, and the United States being the only major country in the world that doesn`t provide health care to all people or family or medical leave? One word?

Was there one word in terms of what the American people want asking the rich and large corporations to start paying their fair share of taxes? Not one word!


And in terms of immigration, which you did hear a whole lot
about, the majority of people believe there should be a process, a path toward citizenship for undocumented people. Not one of those guys had anything to say in support of that concept.


MADDOW: You went to Liberty University this week. Very ideologically unfriendly territory! You were, I listened to the speech; you were very respectful to your audience. They greeted you very respectfully.


SANDERS: Yes, they did.


MADDOW: They heard you respectfully. With Donald Trump so dominant in the Republican field, I wonder if you are starting to think about a plan for trying to appeal to people, who think of themselves not as liberals, not even as centrists, but as moderate conservatives that usually think of themselves as Republicans, but they cannot stomach somebody like Mr. Trump as their nominee. Do you have a crossover appeal?


SANDERS: Absolutely! And, Rachel, to the best of my knowledge in the state of Vermont, we got about 25 percent of the Republican vote. Why is that? Because people say, “okay, I disagree with Bernie on women`s rights. I disagree with Bernie on gay rights. Okay. But you know what? I believe he is fighting for my kids and for my parents and for the rights of the middle class”. And you see a lot of those folks saying, “I disagree with him, but I`m going to vote for them”.


Now, you`re absolutely right! The folks at Liberty University were extremely gracious and respectful. And here was my simple point to them. You guys are a religious group of people. You are concerned about morality. Let`s put it on the table. I disagree with you on abortion rights. I disagree with you on gay rights. End of discussion!


How do we come together? Isn`t it a moral issue that in America today, we are seeing a proliferation of millionaires and billionaires at the same time as we have the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country on earth? Isn`t that a moral issue!


MADDOW: Even if you`re a conservative, you would see that as a moral issue.


SANDERS: Absolutely! It is! I think many of them are saying yes. And we`ve gotten some wonderful responses from some of the evangelicals. Isn`t it a moral issue? Listen to what the pope says, what other religious leaders, evangelicals say, about destroying this planet in terms of climate change. These people understand it. They see it as God`s earth, and it should be protected. And yet you have Republicans out there, not one of them believing that we have to move aggressively to save the planet. Yes, I think we can reach out in a respectful way, understanding there are very important issues we disagree on. Let`s go forward together where we can find common ground.


MADDOW: We have got more with Vermont Senator and Democratic presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, right after this. Stay with us!





QUESTION: We have a problem in this country, it`s called Muslims. We know our current president is one. You know he`s not even an American.


TRUMP: We need this question.


Tabacco: Folks, this is your Republican Party in a Nutshell – Trivial Pursuit, Lies, Half-Truths & a TOTAL WASTE OF TIME! But these are the folks to whom YOU folks have handed over the US SENATE & US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Now they’re angling to retake the WHITE HOUSE! We all know what Republicans are! The Question is, “WHAT KIND OF IDIOTS ARE YOU?”


QUESTION: But anyway, we have training camps growing where they want to kill us. That`s my question. When can we get rid of them?


TRUMP: We`re going to be looking at a lot of different things, and you know, a lot of people are saying that and a lot of people are saying that bad things are happening out there. We are going to be looking at that and plenty of other things. OK, go ahead, yes, ma`am, go ahead.


Tabacco: Folks, this is your Republican Party Frontrunner in a Nutshell – Evasive Responses, Non-Answer Answers, Trivial Pursuit, Lies, Half-Truths, Nonsense & a TOTAL WASTE OF TIME! Trump doesn’t ANSWER because he can’t! He can’t acknowledge by confirming the IDIOCY of his Constituents because he would look like an even BIGGER FOOL than he already does, and he can’t refute his own Constituents because that is a Vote Loser for him. Trump has painted himself between a Rock & a Hard Place!


We’ve had 8-years of George W. Bush – I for one do not want to repeat that experience! REMEMBER HISTORY OR YOU WILL REPEAT IT!


QUESTION: You know, I definitely have to ask you a good veteran question. Welcome first of all to New Hampshire! Donald, last night was a disgrace! CNN did not touch on any of the issues that are going on with veterans’ health care.

Tabacco: I see an Assertion there, but for the life of me I do NOT see a Question! Maybe the questioner as a kid never played ‘Mother, may I?”


TRUMP: It`s true! It`s true! I actually asked them about that. There wasn`t one question relating to the veterans. That`s true!

Tabacco: There weren’t many questions relating to Issues such as Global Warming, Childhood Poverty, Gay Rights, Women’s Rights, Black Lives Matter, Voter Caging, TPP, TARP Funds paid back to government, Israeli Nukes, Cuban Normalization, Russian Exploitation of Ukraine, China Problems, Wealth Disparity & GOP Obstructionism! OK, I am not acting like a Realist with this List!


QUESTION: Did anyone even ask them why — I know that`s a Clinton news network. Is it they don`t like veterans or?


TRUMP: You know what, there was not one question relating to that, and not too much on the military, by the way, but nothing relating to the veterans. Those days, believe me, are over!

Tabacco: CNN = Clinton News Network? In a Pig’s Eye! As to Trump’s “Those days, believe me, are over” comment, how is ‘President’ Trump going to ‘CORRECT’, ‘AMEND’ or ‘MODIFY’ CNN’s Questions? Deny CNN License Renewal?? Remember, Donald, as President, you can’t FIRE CNN!



MADDOW: That was earlier this evening, Republican presidential front-runner, Donald Trump, in New Hampshire asked about President Obama being a Muslim and the need to go get the Muslims because we have a Muslim problem in this country. Mr. Trump said, “we`ll be looking into that!” Profiles in courage there!


But then the follow-up question you just heard there about veterans. And Mr. Trump also had no answer for that. That really is a question worth getting an answer to.


We`re back with Senator Bernie Sanders, who is our guest tonight for the interview. Senator, I want to ask you about veterans’ issues. In part, because even though support for veterans is usually a pretty nonpartisan thing, there are some particularly radical takes on veterans’ issues among leading Republican candidates this year. Their frontrunner this week did an event on a battleship with a group that he said represented hundreds of thousands of veterans. In fact, it`s a group that no real veterans’ organizations have heard of. They apparently have no membership. FEC filings show them to have $30 in the bank, and there`s only one person associated with the group. The IRS recently revoked their nonprofit status. Mr. Trump says now that that event on that battleship with that one guy from that organization means he has veterans’ support. Mr. Trump also has no platform whatsoever on veterans’ issues. And that comes as several other candidates on the Republican side, including the guy running second, Ben Carson, say they want to abolish the VA. They want to privatize the VA.


You just finished up a term as chairman of Veterans Affairs in the Senate. What is your response to the Republican positioning on this issue?


SANDERS: It`s an outrage! I was chairman of the Senate Veterans Committee for two years. We managed to pass actually a bipartisan bill for some $17 billion to improve VA health care and some other issues. I introduced what was called the most comprehensive and boldest of veterans’ legislation in modern history, which got us the support of the VFW and the American Legion and the DAV, and many of the major veterans organizations. We only got two Republican votes in the Senate to pass that.


Here is the bottom line. As a nation, I think we understand now what we didn`t always understand. You don`t blame the men and women, who put their lives on the line for the wars they`re fighting in.

Tabacco: Tabacco agrees to disagree with Bernie Sanders on this Point! But then again, Sanders is running for President and MUST PANDER – I am not! If we can’t blame VOLUNTEER soldiers for VOLUNTEERING to fight in WARS FOR PROFIT, then how can we possibly blame Voters for giving Control of both the Senate and the House to Republicans? Thank God, Tabacco does NOT have to PANDER! Hell, I rarely pander to you Readers!


All right? We didn`t always know that, I think back in Vietnam. I voted against the war in Iraq! That was one of the best votes I ever cast. But I have also worked day and night to make sure that the men and women from all of our wars get the health care and the other benefits to which they are entitled. And in some ways, we`re making progress. In some ways, we`re not. But absolutely the answer is not to privatize the VA! The answer is to strengthen it.


MADDOW: I remember talking to you about the scandal in the VA of wait times and VA facilities lying about wait times, while that scandal was emerging, you were supportive of General Eric Shinseki staying as the head of the VA long time after some veterans’ groups and some other people were really calling for his head. Now that he is gone, do you think it was right that he stepped down? Has Robert McDonald been doing any better trying to fix the VA since then?


SANDERS: The answer is I think McDonald is trying his very best to deal with an enormous bureaucracy that is out there. One of the other things, Rachel, which I learned as chairman, is it isn’t very easy. The VA has 152 medical centers and some 800 community-based outreach clinics. Every day there`s a problem. But every day there`s a problem in any and every medical facility in America. And if all you talk about are the negative things, then people get a certain view of the VA.


When I was chairman, I had all of the major veterans’ organizations in front of me: American Legion, all of them! And I said, tell me, when veterans get into the VA, do you think the quality of care is good? And they said, “it`s good to excellent!” And that`s how most veterans feel.


Now, what we try to do and have done is put $5 billion into the VA to increase the number of doctors, nurses, and other medical personnel they need, so that we can make sure never again will veterans be put on long waiting lines.


MADDOW: Because of those long waiting lines, though, because of the scandal, because of the things the VA hasn`t done right, that`s a big political opening now for the right to try to kill the VA. Is that a concerted effort?

Tabacco: Most Politicians use exasperating problems as an opportunity to PRIVATIZE – Republicans want to Privatize Social Security, Medicare, Postal Service, Public Education & the VA; Democrats want to Privatize Public Education! It’s all about the Benjamins! Since members of both Parties want Charter Schools, the Future for Public Education looks even bleaker than the present state of affairs.




SANDERS: Of course it is! It`s the same attack — look, same thing with the Postal Service. There`s a desire to — I`ve been very involved in this issue, to privatize the Postal Service. The same thing with Social Security. To privatize or cut Social Security and Medicare! Look at what the Koch brothers and these guys believe. They don`t believe in government. That is their underlying philosophy. Yes, they don`t believe in public education. So there is a concerted attack against every major public institution from the VA to Social Security on down.


MADDOW: Vermont Senator and Democratic candidate for president of the United States, Bernie Sanders, you did not know you would be at this point in your campaign when you launched it. And I know, because I can tell. I didn`t know! It is a remarkable thing as a liberal to see the success you`re having and the resonance your message is having. And I don`t know what`s going to happen in the campaign long-term, but good luck to you in the long-term.

Tabacco: Even the GOOD GUYS, like Rachel Maddow, avoid certain Terminology such as SOCIALISM! Fear not! I don’t let anybody get away with anything – but I didn’t say, “Never!”


MADDOW: We`ll be right back. Stay with us.




MADDOW: OK, two things still to come tonight! The first is Steve Kornacki, yeh!


The second is that there`s going to be another big Republican presidential debate thing tomorrow. It`s a debate-like thing. It`s not technically a debate, but yes, in case you didn`t get enough, and the details of it are kind of stunning. We`ve got more ahead. Stay with us tonight.





[21:51:55] SANDERS: One of the excited aspects of what`s happening right now is I think we have close to 200,000 volunteers. And this stuff is sprouting up all over the country. I read about it in the papers. We didn`t organize, and a lot of this is spontaneous, and it`s very moving to me.



MADDOW: Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders on the show just moments ago.


Joining us now is my colleague Steve Kornacki, the host of “Up with Steve Kornacki”, right here on MSNBC.


Hey, Steve!


STEVE KORNACKI, HOST, “UP”: How are you doing, Rachel?


MADDOW: Good! So I know you heard the Bernie Sanders interview. Your political, professional opinion on where he stands in this race right now. It`s really interesting for me to hear him say that it`s a moving experience, that he didn`t expect this, that he was shocked. What do you make of it?


KORNACKI: Yes, I know! I thought it was interesting to hear him say that, too. And I think a lot of people are shocked looking at this. I mean, it`s hard to believe just 4 or 5 months ago, it was controversial to say that. hey, maybe Bernie Sanders has a better shot against Hillary than Martin O`Malley. And look where we are right now! And now the fact that he`s leading in some of these early states!


So I think if you play it out a little bit. Let`s say he`s able to sustain the strength that he has right now in Iowa, to sustain the strength in New Hampshire. You look at two things.


First of all, there`s always this battle that takes place between the establishment candidate and the insurgent. Obama played insurgent role in `08. Howard Dean played the insurgent role back, you know, in 2004 and on and on and on.


It`s never happened that the insurgent candidate has gone in and won the first two states, Iowa and New Hampshire. You go back like 1984. Walter Mondale wins Iowa. Gary Hart wins New Hampshire. Now we have our race.


You know, in 2000, you had Al Gore, the establishment candidate; he beats Bill Bradley in those first two states. That ends the race on the spot. It`s never happened that the insurgent wins both of those.


MADDOW: Both Iowa and New Hampshire!


KORNACKI: So, yes, I`m torn looking at this between two possible scenarios here. One is a world in which Bernie Sanders actually pulls that off. And right now, you look at it and say, it`s plausible that he could pull that off.


Is that a world where there`s such panic and there`s such chaos that things crumble for Hillary Clinton down the line because the flipside is when you look down the line, the states that Hillary Clinton`s campaign is pointing to right now, the southern states, the super Tuesday states, the SEC primary states, these are states where traditionally the establishment candidate has faired very well. The establishment candidate tends to get overwhelming support from black voters. Black voters loom so large in the south. So that`s her firewall. So those two things are sort of in conflict with each other.


MADDOW: In terms of the candidates — in terms of those two candidates facing off against each other, how much do they need to trim their sales or think about their strategy in light of a possible entry from Joe Biden?


I mean, I personally — if you want my personal opinion, I don`t believe that Vice President Biden is going to get in. I just don`t feel like he`s going to. I have nothing to base that on because I don`t think he knows if he`s going to get in.


But they have to be planning differently because there is a possibility he might jump?


KORNACKI: Yes! It complicates things very much in terms of if you`re looking at where Biden is taking the support from right now, it`s coming a little bit from the Sanders side. It`s coming a little bit from the Hillary side. It`s not clear that he`s drawing just from one.


The problem here, I think this is more of a problem for Biden to think about, too, is this. If you take the national polls right now, Hillary, Biden, Sanders. If you add up the Sanders and Biden numbers, that`s enough to give Hillary a lot of gain. I mean, they`re basically tied with her if you add those together.


[21:55:40] So if you`re Joe Biden, you`re saying, my strategy has got to be that I get what I have right now and I`ve got to fold in the Bernie Sanders people. That`s a very tough thing to do when you look at how committed so many of the Sanders’ voters, specifically to Bernie Sanders.


So you would need a scenario if you`re Joe Biden, where basically, you take out Bernie Sanders in those first two states, Iowa and New Hampshire. Bernie Sanders is not considered a factor coming out of there, then you Joe Biden get the one-on-one with Hillary. Maybe you inherit Biden – Sanders’ supporters. And then the big wild card if you really want to play this out, the wild card for Biden would be how he can reverse that southern math that usually favors the establishment.


Would in that scenario, President Obama, his boss, his close personal friend, would President Obama see Joe Biden coming out of a New Hampshire win and say, “I`ll back you in South Carolina.” That could change the math.


MADDOW: Right! Wow!


And just back to the president, listening to Bernie Sanders tonight, thinking about any other candidate trying to inherit his supporters! Trying to match the passion they have! It`s very hard to imagine that being a transitive thing!

Tabacco: Now Tabacco MUST TAKE ISSUE WITH MADDOW! She’s speaking the Truth, but she’s NOT SAYING ANYTHING! She sounds like a GOPer Commentator! She’s NOT saying WHY Bernie Sanders’ BASE is NOT TRANSFERABLE! There’s that PINK ELEPHANT IN THE CORNER – SOCIALISM!


Why doesn’t Rachel Maddow just say that, “a lot of Americans are just FED UP with Have-Mores running America and using CAPITALISM to REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH TO THE TOP!”


Answer: She’s trying NOT to offend all those Americans, who have swallowed the Capitalist PROPAGANDA Hook-Line-And-Sinker equating Socialism to Communism! If you read this Column regularly, you know that Association is FALSE – it’s FALSE because RED CHINA is CAPITALIST! And CHINA is still RED or COMMUNIST! SOCIALISM does NOT NECESSARILY mean COMMUNISM!


Steve Kornacki, host of, “Up,” weekend mornings here on MSNBC.


Steve, thank you! I really appreciate it!


All right, we`ll be right back. Stay with us!




MADDOW: So was last night too short? Was five straight hours of Republicans talking not enough for you? If that`s how you feel then I`ve got good news for you, you weirdo, because the Republican candidates are going to square off again tomorrow night in an event that has an even longer format.


I am not kidding!


It`s a “Heritage Action for America” forum tomorrow in South Carolina. It is scheduled to last six hours. Sadly, even though, it is in South Carolina, Heritage Action has decided that home state South Carolina Senator, Lindsey Graham, is not polling well enough to qualify so they will not let him in, but most of the rest of the field will be there including Donald Trump who, weirdly, even though everybody else has normal headshots in their promo materials.


For this event, he has been cast as some sort of raptor. That`s a terrible picture! That`s six hours of Republicans talking is on top tomorrow in South Carolina just in case that`s what you needed.


That does it for us tonight; we`ll see you again tomorrow, now it`s time for THE LAST WORD with Lawrence O`Donnell.








Ross Perot was NOT the Answer! Although FDR was a Rich man, Perot was NO FDR! As President, Ross would have done what he always had done – he would have been a Capitalist, looked out for the Capitalists & Corporatists, who were his buddies, not the Middleclass, whom he was duping!


Mitt Romney was NOT the Answer! In addition to being FILTHY RICH, Mitt was a Republican! No Republican since Teddy Roosevelt has been the Answer! And there will never be another TR on the Republican Ticket!


Barack Obama was NOT the Answer! The 1st Black Man, a Democrat with excellent resume – BUT! Obama was and is in the Pocket of the Corporatists! What White President in either Party would have dared to NEGOTIATE








Regardless of Republican SPIN, President Barack Obama is NO LIBERAL, NO PROGRESSIVE and barely a Democrat. A Democan maybe – but not a Democrat! And I am a Black Democrat who had great hopes for Barack Obama. Republicrats notwithstanding, Obama never really attempted to do right by the Middleclass, let alone Blacks!


The Trans-Pacific Partnership, the 2nd Half of T.A.R.P. and hiding the Loan Paybacks + Interest in the Government’s GENERAL FUND as a SLUSH FUND! Obama is NO FDR!


BERNIE SANDERS, VERMONT GOVERNOR, DEMOCRAT & UTILITARIAN, is Americans’ ONLY CHANCE to throw off the Shackles of Capitalism for the Elites and REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH back in the direction of WE THE PEOPLE! That’s right – REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH!


If it’s NOT a DIRTY PHRASE when Republicans Enact Legislation to benefit Haves and Have-Mores, then it won’t be a DIRTY PHRASE when President Bernie Sanders enacts Legislation to benefit WE THE PEOPLE!


Of course, NO PRESIDENT can do it alone! Bernie needs not just your Vote for him as President, he also requires Control of the Senate and the House of Representatives!


Bill Clinton, with Republican Control of both Houses, was more Republican than Ronald Reagan!


Barack Obama, with Republican Control of both Houses, was more Republican than George W. Bush!


Even if we have a President, who wants to do the CORRECT THING, he must have Control of both Houses (at least the GOP must not have a Majority in the House or 40-Votes in the Senate for Filibuster) or Republicans will do what Republicans do –





Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.



If Tabacco is talking about a subject that nobody else is discussing, it means that subject is more, not less important, and the Powers-That-Be are deliberately avoiding that Issue. To presume otherwise completely defeats my purpose in blogging.



Tabacco is not a blogger, who thinks; I am a Thinker, who blogs. Speaking Truth to Power!


In 1981′s ‘Body Heat’, Kathleen Turner said, “Knowledge is power”.

T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World: WTP = We The People


To Read Comments On This Post, Go To:


To Go To The Tabacco Main Page

Listing All Posts, Go To:


To Read Posts On My Wyandanch Blog, Go To

Wyandanch Main Page:

Subdomain re Exploited Minority Long Island community







Anyone may Comment here, but if you want your Comment published, you must obey the TABACCO RULES as stipulated in:


TABACCO’S RULES OF ENGAGEMENT! Most Comments Here Don’t Get Published. This Post Is Not Aimed At Those Charlatans; It is Intended To Edify My Veto Stance To The Intellectually Honest Readers Among You.


Because of Spam, Capitalists attempting to gain Free Advertising on my Blogs and other irrelevancies, Tabacco no longer reads Comments on Posts.


Relevant Post or Post URL must appear as e-mail SUBJECT!


To register a Comment, e-mail Tabacco at:





This entry was posted in Bush, class war, compromise, Democrats, deregulation, disaster capitalism, GOP, hypocrisy, illicit drugs, knowledge is power, Obama, outsourcing, political ping pong, Politics, Republicans, socialism4richcapitalism4poor, sophistry, takebackamerica, warpeace and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to BERNIE SANDERS On The Left & 2-Parter GOP Debate(s) Reviewed By Rachel Maddow On The Right: Stated Another Way, ‘From The Sublime To The Ridiculous!’ Bernie Vs. Hillary! Can Bernie Be First Insurgent Democrat To Defeat Establishment Candidate In Both Iowa & New Hampshire? Which Candidate Is Drawing The Biggest Crowds – Trump Or Sanders? Yet Which Candidate Has The Least Money? Donald Trump’s BIG BOO-BOO Endorsement From ‘Veterans For A Strong America’ ASTROTURF Group With 0-Members (That’s Zero Members, Folks)! Trump Was Scammed! He Should Have Googled Or Binged! What A Business Typhoon He Is! Now, Class, How Many Times Has Donald Trump Filed Corporate Bankruptcy Over 18-Year Period? The Answer Is 4: 1991, 1992, 2004, 2009. Does America Have The Time To Wait For A President Trump To Get It Right? “Oh, My Fellow Americans, I Guess I Pushed The Wrong Button This Time! There Goes Moscow! And There Goes NYC And DC! Sorry! I’ll Do Better Next Time!”

  1. admin says:


    Right-Wingers are insisting that Vaccines Protocol is leading directly to AUTISM! I personally cannot disagree. I had personal experiences with 2 pet cats, which got different forms of Cancer after being vaccinated by Vets. However, those are just 2 isolated experiences with pets, not children.

    Right-Wingers offer Isolated Incidents as Proof they are correct. That won’t do! But the Right has been getting away with this Strategy for years – “Obama is not a citizen”, “Obama is a Muslim”, “Obama is a Liberal”. None of these charges have ever been substantiated by anything except other Republicans and their Constituents repetition of those charges.

    What did the Nazis say? “If you repeat a Lie often enough….”

    Now the Left-Wing (of which I am a member although I tend toward the Rightists on this particular Issue) is IMITATING the Right-Wing by offering no substantive proof of its position.

    Where’s the BEEF!

    If the AMA has done Studies on Vaccinations vs. Autism, let’s have the Evidence! Even if the spokesman is a member in good standing of the AMA, I will NOT be convinced by his or her Assertions. We have not seen any Evidence, and we might not understand if we had, but we want to see Evidence just the same. Give us the ‘Vaccination Vs. Autism Studies For Dummies’ version so we can draw intelligent conclusions!

    The AMA has been known to be WRONG before. The AMA over-medicated AIDS patients with AZT! Those, who died, died from AZT, not from AIDS! There are a multitude of IATROGENIC INCIDENTS in America – not just AZT! If we have no Facts, we cannot argue convincingly about a relationship between Vaccinations and Autism! That is a DEAD END!

    Hell, the HOLY BIBLE is replete with WRONG ASSERTIONS! “God created the earth in 6 days; on the 7th day He rested”. “6 days” is only WRONG by about 4.5 billion years, and Why would God need to “rest”!

    So if the Bible can ERR, and if the AMA can ERR, why should we ever take anybody’s word for anything without substantiation of some sort other than more repetition by members of the same political party or indeed the same Medical Organization WITHOUT PROOF!

    I say to Democratic Leaders, Republican Leaders and the AMA, “WHERE’S THE EVIDENCE FROM VACCINATION VS. AUTISM STUDIES” – the ‘For Dummies’ Version?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>