“CENTRAL PARK FIVE” (A New Film), 5-Black & Hispanic Youths Exonerated But Never Reimbursed For Up To 13-Years Spent In Prison Re Bogus Police Entrapment & Railroading In The 1989 “Central Park Jogger” Case (“The Crime Of The Century”? – Only Because Those In Charge Thought The Guilty Were BLACK). We’re Talking Here New York, NY, Not New York, Mississippi! Is American Justice Blind Or Just Blindly, Racially Prejudiced! There Were 6-VICTIMS Here, Not Just 1! But Only The 1-White Female Victim Received Special Consideration – The 5-Victims Of Color Got American INJUSTICE As Usual!

 

               

          Lady Justice, Blind Or Does She Peek?

 

 

Innocence On Trial

 


 

Wednesday, November 28, 2012 Full Show

“Central Park Five”: New Film on How Police Abuse, Media Frenzy Led to Jailing of Innocent Teens

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/11/28/central_park_five_new_film_on

 

An explosive new documentary looks at a case once referred to as “the crime of the century”: the Central Park Five. Many people have heard about the case, but far too few know that innocent men were imprisoned as a result. The film tells the story of how five black and Latino teenagers were arrested in 1989 for beating and raping a white woman in New York City’s Central Park. Media coverage at the time portrayed the teens as guilty and used racially coded terms like “wolf pack” to refer to the group of boys accused in the attack. Donald Trump took out full-page ads in four city newspapers calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty so they could be executed. However, the convictions of the five were vacated in 2002 when the real rapist came forward and confessed to the crime, after the five defendants had already served sentences of almost seven to 13 years. New York City is refusing to settle a decade-long civil lawsuit brought by the men. And now lawyers for the city are seeking access to footage gathered for the new film. We speak to one of the Central Park Five, Raymond Santana; filmmaker Sarah Burns; and journalist Natalie Byfield. [includes rush transcript]

 

Filed under  Race in America, Raymond Santana, Sarah Burns, Natalie Byfield

 

Guests:

 

Raymond Santana, one of the Central Park Five. His conviction was overturned after the real rapist confessed to the crime.

 

Sarah Burns, directed and produced the new documentary, The Central Park Five, along with her father, award-winning filmmaker Ken Burns, and her husband, David McMahon. It has opened in theaters this week and is playing in New York City at the IFC Center and Lincoln Plaza Cinemas. She is also the author of the 2011 book, The Central Park Five: The Untold Story Behind One of New York City’s Most Infamous Crimes.

 

Natalie Byfield, was a reporter for the Daily News at the time of Central Park Five case and is featured in the new documentary. She is now an assistant professor of sociology at St. John’s University in Queens. Her forthcoming book is called Savage Portrayals: Race, Media, and the Central Park Jogger Story.

 

Related

 

 

 

 

 

Links

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Editor’s Picks

 

 

 

Rush Transcript

This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution. Donate >

 

 

Transcript

 

NERMEENSHAIKH: We turn now to an explosive new documentary co-directed by Ken Burns that looks at a case once referred to as, quote, “the crime of the century.” The film is called The Central Park Five. Many people have heard about the case, but far too few know that innocent men were imprisoned as a result.

 

The film tells the story of how five black and Latino teenagers were arrested in 1989 for beating and raping a white woman in New York City’s Central Park. She came to be known as the Central Park jogger. Media coverage at the time portrayed the teens as guilty and used racially coded terms like “wolf pack” to refer to the group of boys accused in the attack. Donald Trump took out full-page ads in four city newspapers calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty so they could be executed.

 

But in 2002, the convictions in the Central Park Five case were vacated after the real rapist came forward and confessed to the crime. DNA evidence confirmed he was the sole attacker. This came after the five defendants had already served sentences of almost seven to 13 years for the assault. To this day, their case continues to impact how the criminal justice system treats juvenile offenders.

 

This is the trailer for The Central Park Five.

 

JIMDWYER: I want us to remember what happened that day and be horrified by ourselves. New York in the late 1980s was a completely schizophrenic, divided city.

 

REV. AL SHARPTON: New York is now the capital of racial violence.

 

BERNHARDGOETZ: If I had more bullets, I would have shot them all again and again.

 

JIMDWYER: Criminality, gang wars, drug wars—we were supposed to be afraid. It would have been irrational not to be afraid.

 

UNIDENTIFIED: Off with the camera, man!

 

COMMISSIONERRICHARDCONDON: Last night, a woman jogger was found unconscious and partially clothed in Central Park. She was beaten and sexually assaulted.

 

ED KOCH: A woman jogging in Central Park. Central Park was holy. It was the crime of the century.

 

COMMISSIONERRICHARDCONDON: Five youths were arrested on 96th Street, all between 14 and 15 years of age.

(TABACCO: Everyone knows if BLACK 14s and 15s are arrested, they must be GUILTY, RIGHT! That “Innocent until Proven Guilty” stuff only applies to White Folks!)

 

ED KOCH: They got ’em!

(TABACCO: “Go back to Tel Aviv, Ed!” You see, folks, even Homosexuals like Ed Koch can be unfair as Hell! And YES, I can PROVE it, but this isn’t about Ed Koch!)

 

SAULKASSIN: You can only imagine the pressure to have this crime solved and solved quickly.

 

KEVINRICHARDSON: First we was all together. Then they started to put us in different rooms, separately.

 

YUSEFSALAAM: “What did you do? Who were you with? Who did you come with?” The tone was very scary. I felt like they might take us to the back of the precinct and kill us.

 

KOREYWISE: You’re not going to go home until you give up a story.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA SR.: I told my son, “Go to the park,” that night. I feel guilty.

 

KEVINRICHARDSON: I’m telling the guy, “I don’t know what you’re talking about.” They’re getting a little angry.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: And they’re like, “You know you did it. Didn’t you?”

 

UNIDENTIFIED: He had been interrogated for over 24 hours. That amounts to pressure.

 

NATALIEBYFIELD: These young men were guilty. It was almost unquestioned.

 

LYNNELLHANCOCK: The police controlled the story. They created the story.

 

CALVIN O. BUTTSIII: They seized on the fears of the people. “Wilding,” the bestial characterization of the black man.

 

MICHAELWARREN: There’s no DNA match whatsoever to any of these boys.

 

RONALDGOLD: I was going nuts. No blood on the kids. Nobody could identify them. But if they confessed, they confessed, and that was that.

 

JIMDWYER: A lot of people didn’t do their jobs—reporters, police, prosecutors, defense lawyers.

 

UNIDENTIFIED: This was institutional protectionism.

 

CRAIGSTEVENWILDER: We falsely convicted them, and we walked away from our crime.

 

UNIDENTIFIED: This is the ultimate siren that says none of us is safe.

 

AMYGOODMAN: That is a trailer of The Central Park Five, which has just opened in theaters and has brought new attention to a case that continues to unfold well over a decade after it happened. Right now New York City is refusing to settle a civil lawsuit brought by the five men whose convictions were overturned after they spent years in prison, and now lawyers for the city are seeking access to footage gathered for the new film.

 

For more, we’re joined in our studio by three guests. Ray Santana is with us. Raymond Santana is one of the Central Park Five. His conviction was overturned after the real rapist confessed to the crime, Matias Reyes. Sarah Burns is with us. She directed and produced the new documentary, The Central Park Five, along with her father, the award-winning filmmaker Ken Burns, as well as her husband David McMahon. She is also author of the 2011 book, The Central Park Five: A Chronicle of a City Wilding. And we’re joined by Natalie Byfield. She was a reporter for the New York Daily News at the time of the Central Park Five case, featured in this new documentary, now an assistant professor of sociology at St. John’s University in Queens. Her forthcoming book is called Savage Portrayals: Race, Media, and the Central Park Jogger Story.

 

We welcome you all to Democracy Now! Sarah, let’s begin with you, how you got involved with this case.

 

SARAHBURNS: I was too young in 1989 to have followed it at all, and so I learned about it for the first time in 2003 as a college student interning for one of the civil rights lawyers who’s now involved in the civil suit. And so, I learned about the case, I met Raymond and Kevin that summer, and I became fascinated by this story, this miscarriage of justice and how it had happened. And so, I actually wrote my undergraduate thesis about it before turning my attention to working on the book and then the film.

 

AMYGOODMAN: I want to turn to a first clip of the film after the trailer. This is a most stunning story. And before we do, I wanted to ask—I wanted to ask about the New York Police Department and how it dealt. The NYPD’s assistant chief of detectives at the time, Aaron Rosenthal, made one of his first statements to the media about the Central Park jogger case shortly after the attack occurred.

 

ARRONROSENTHAL: Approximately 1:30 this morning, two males walking through Central Park north of the 102nd Street jogging path found a female. She was still alive and, in fact, still is alive. The female was clad only in a bra. She was lying exposed in the area, appeared to have been exposed for a couple of hours, her body temperature down very low. Around her mouth was an article of clothing that was wrapped around her face, and the same article was used to bind her wrists to her face. She had been struck around the head repeatedly. Mud on her body. She appears to have been dragged through the woods north into the shrub area. She was taken to Metropolitan Hospital, where she’s classified as in serious condition.

 

AMYGOODMAN: That was one of the police chiefs at the time. Natalie Byfield, lay out the story for those who aren’t familiar, from 1989.

 

NATALIEBYFIELD: A woman was found early in the morning of April 20th, 1989, raped in the park. She was near dead, as the chief of—one of the head detectives here was saying. And then blanket coverage ensued in all of the newsrooms across the city.

 

 

AMYGOODMAN: Including yours, the New York Daily News.

 

NATALIEBYFIELD: Including mine, the New York Daily News. And this was one of more than some 3,000 rapes that were committed in the city that year. But what we had with this coverage was something much different. It was blanket coverage, the type of coverage that you see with a disaster, where all resources are deployed to cover this rape. And this intensity, this level of intensity in the coverage, continued for maybe the first two months of coverage.

 

And during this time, a particular narrative was developed about what this—what happened and what happened to the victim and also what this case was about. And the narrative really said that these young black and Latino teens—there was one person as young as 13, who was picked up and arrested in the time immediately after the incident, but these young black and Latino teens were on some type of—some type of mayhem, running through the park, and it manifested itself into the rape of this woman. And this type of thing is called “wilding,” because it’s a new type of incident. So we had the—we had in the coverage this sort of explanation that told the city, told the rest of the world, really, because it was covered internationally, that some new type of crime was developing across the city that was being committed by these young black and Latino male teens.

 

NERMEENSHAIKH: But can you set out the scene here, though? One of the people, Jim Dwyer, I believe, from the New York Times in the documentary says that the way this case was represented in the media had to do—like the people who were actually convicted were proxies for other wars that were being fought in the city, had to do with crack cocaine coming into these neighborhoods, increasing rates of poverty, etc. Can you explain a little bit what the scene was?

 

NATALIEBYFIELD: Sure, in terms of the context of what was going on in the city and really in the nation at the time, there was this war on drugs that was being prosecuted across the nation. And in terms of this war on drugs being prosecuted, black and Latino male teens were the ones who were seen as the main problem in this drug crisis happening in the country. And then, of course, we had crack cocaine becoming a bigger and bigger problem in poor and minority communities. So, they became the target of all that was wrong—or they became the face of all that was wrong in society at the time. So, in that context, this case happened with that larger backdrop taking place. And once this incident happened, it really amped up in people’s minds the level of problem that black and Latino teens, male teens, represented and the fear that we needed to feel about this particular group of people.

 

And, well, what I wanted to add about that is that the drug crisis, the drug problem, existed across all strata and in all communities in the country. Youth violence was rising in all communities across the country. And the surgeon general, a little after this, did a study about this, and the fact that we targeted—we, as a society, targeted—young black and Latino teens as the problem is part of what was taking place.

 

AMYGOODMAN: We’re going to break again. When we come back, we’re going to hear from one of the Central Park Five, Raymond Santana, to talk about his experience. We are talking now almost 20—well, over 20 years ago. Stay with us.

 

[break]

 

AMYGOODMAN: Our guests are Sarah Burns, who is the director of this remarkable new film called The Central Park Five. We are also joined by the former New York Daily News reporter Natalie Byfield, who was there in 1989 in the newsroom when the attack on Trisha Meili took place. She wasn’t named for years, but she was the investment banker, the 28-year-old woman, a white woman, who was raped in Central Park. And we’re joined by Raymond Santana.

 

Raymond, before I ask about your experience, in this excerpt from The Central Park Five documentary, two of the defendants, [Yusef Salaam] and you, Raymond Santana, describe how detectives tried to play them against each other during their separate interrogations.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: It got to one point where they pulled me, Yusef and Antron in a conference room. And a lawyer says, “You know, we’re going to lose this case. What we’re planning to do is see if we can get you a plea deal.”

 

YUSEFSALAAM: And I remember telling them, “You know, you guys can cop out, but if I did something, I would cop out. I would want the least amount of time for what I did. But if I didn’t do anything, you can give me the rest of my life in prison.” You know, I didn’t know what that meant back then, but I just knew that there would be no way that I would cop out to something that I didn’t do.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: They said, “Well, it has to be all three of you guys, or it’s nobody.”

 

AMYGOODMAN: That was Raymond Santana and Yusef Salaam, another of the Central Park Five. Now let’s go to this next clip.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Hartigan sat down, and he said, “Look, Ray, I know you didn’t do anything wrong, but the other guys right now, they’re in other precincts, and they’re saying that you did it.”

 

KEVINRICHARDSON: And they’re telling me, “Well, you’re not saying nothing, but these guys put your name in it.”

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: And I’m like, “I didn’t do anything.” And he’s like, “Well, this is why I’m here to help you, because I know you didn’t do anything. You’re a good kid. You know, this isn’t you.” He pulls out this picture of Kevin Richardson, and he goes, “You know this kid?” And I’m like, “No, I don’t know him.” And he goes, “You see the scratch under his eye? That came from the woman. We know he did it. He’s going down.”

 

KEVINRICHARDSON: At this point, I’m like, you know, like, I don’t know these guys that’s there, so I’m just going to make up something and include these guys’ names.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: OK, if—you know, if you’re going to do it to me, then I’m going to do it to you.

 

AMYGOODMAN: That’s Raymond Santana in the film and Kevin Richardson. Raymond, you were 14 years old, and so was Kevin.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Yes, that’s correct.

 

AMYGOODMAN: They, the police—where were your parents? Were they in the room? Did you have a lawyer?

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: No, I didn’t have a lawyer at that time. And my grandmother was present, but, you know, one of the police tactics that was used against us was they would pull her out the room, and—you know, and they would talk to her in the hallway. And as they talked to her in the hallway is when they started to really get aggressive towards me and use, you know, some of those tactics that we talked about in the film, yeah.

 

NERMEENSHAIKH: And what happened once you—once you got out, once you got out of prison? I mean, you were—you stayed in prison, and then, after that, the sentence was only overturned once you were out, and then you were back in prison afterwards.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Yes.

 

NERMEENSHAIKH: Can you talk about the narrative? Explain what happened.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Well, what happened was, once I came home, you know, from serving the prison term—

 

NERMEENSHAIKH: How many years did you serve?

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: I served almost seven years. And so, what happened was that, you know, I tried to get my life back together and put one foot in front of the other, but I didn’t—you know, I didn’t realize the social death that we were given at the sentence. You know, this wasn’t a five to 15 or five to 10; this was a life sentence, a death sentence, in a sense, because, you know, when I came home, I couldn’t get employment. You know, I tried out—filled out numerous applications. And, you know, I had to register as a sex offender. You know, my whole neighborhood looked at me, you know, kind of strange, you know. You know, you get the “Hi, how are you doing?” but, you know, you always have that bullseye on the back, you know, that says, “Someway, somehow, I’m Raymond Santana from the Central Park jogger case.”

-

You know, my family shunned away from me, so I thought I was all-alone. I had—you know, there was nowhere I can turn. There was no transitional programs for me to come back into society into, and so—and be productive. And so I crashed. And I didn’t know what to do. And I turned back to crime, and I started selling—you know, I started selling drugs. And I got charged—and I got arrested, and I was charged with criminal possession with the intent to distribute.

 

AMYGOODMAN: Now, you wouldn’t have been in jail that long except that you had this case before.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: That’s correct.

 

AMYGOODMAN: This case that you ultimately were wrongly imprisoned for. I have a connection to this case, because a woman in my apartment building was the last one raped by Matias Reyes, the man—and he was caught by our doorman—

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Yes.

 

AMYGOODMAN: —as he tried to race out of the building. This is the man who would later testify that he did the rape. And, of course, the DNA matched and everything. Where were you when you heard the news that you were being exonerated and you would be released, that the real rapist of Trisha Meili had come forward?

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: I was in Franklin Correctional Facility in Malone County, which is about eight to nine hours away from New York City. And, you know, and previously, before that, I was in Downstate Correctional, and that’s where I actually got the news. You know, I called my dad, and he told me that Reyes had came forward. And I didn’t believe him. I was so also institutionalized by that point that I just felt that Morgenthau from the DA’s office would just sweep it under the rug, they would try to make him the sixth man, and I would just go to grave with this label, the Central Park jogger—Central Park Five, on my back.

 

AMYGOODMAN: So you sued, along with the other men—

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Yes.

 

AMYGOODMAN: —who are now men. You were boys then. You were 14 years old when this all started.

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Yes.

 

AMYGOODMAN: It’s 20—more than 20 years later. What’s happened?

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Well, you know, right now we’re currently in depositions, you know, with no end in sight. The city loves to use these tactics against us.

 

AMYGOODMAN: Sarah Burns, they asked for outtakes of your film?

 

RAYMONDSANTANA: Yes.

 

SARAHBURNS: Yes, they served us with a subpoena a couple months ago, asking for, initially, everything we’d collected: notes, outtakes, footage, everything. And when we pushed back, they responded with a new subpoena that was narrowed somewhat. But we feel that we’re protected by the shield laws for journalists, and so we filed a motion to quash the subpoena.

 

AMYGOODMAN: You’ve spoken with Trisha Meili?

 

SARAHBURNS: I did speak with her early on—

 

AMYGOODMAN: The victim.

 

SARAHBURNS: —in the process of the book. I obviously wanted to hear what she had to say about it.

 

AMYGOODMAN: What did she say about these men, now that it is absolutely confirmed that Matias Reyes was the rapist? He had used this MO over and over again.

 

SARAHBURNS: She doesn’t really comment on it. She chose at that time not to participate in the book or the film project. And, you know, she wrote her own book that was published in 2003 about her recovery from what was not only a brutal rape but also a traumatic brain injury. And so, she was not expected to live. She was in a coma for nearly two weeks and really made a miraculous recovery. And so, she sort of focused more on that part of her story and has really declined to talk about this question that was later raised about what actually happened.

 

AMYGOODMAN: Well, we will continue this conversation and post it online at democracynow.org. A remarkable film, Sarah. It’s opening around the country now. Sarah Burns is the director, together with her father Ken Burns; Natalie Byfield, the reporter; Raymond Santana, the prisoner, now freed.

 

 

TABACCO: The WHITE-CONTROLLED MSM (Mainstream Media) is always happy as a Lark whenever it appears the Perpetrator(s) of an Infamous Crime is (are) Black! Why do you think that is?

 

Have you ever heard of the O. J. Simpson SAGA? “Don’t be silly, Tabacco, of course I have!”

 

But how much do you know about the Robert Blake SAGA? As a child actor, Blake played Little Beaver in the 1950s ‘Red Rider’ Western series and was featured on “Our Gang”. After successfully graduating to adult movie & TV roles, Blake starred as TV’s “Baretta” and in the Truman Capote penned “In Cold Blood” when it was made into a film.

 

But apparently Caucasian Robert Blake was inconsequential so far as the MSM (Major Media) was concerned. Blake’s pre-trial stint for having his wife murdered was spent wearing a boot under house arrest, unlike the Black O. J. Simpson of NFL, College Football & Avis Commercial fame, who spent his pre-trial stint in a prison cell.

 

Both were acquitted, but only the BLACK O. J. became famous for the UROXICIDE! Only the BLACK O. J. received the sort of vilification and invective generally reserved for Adolf Hitler and the Nazis – in fact, the Nazis get treated much better on TV these days! How silly of me! I forgot that Hitler & his Nazis were WHITE! America can forgive Whites even if they were Nazis!

 

One must dig to get the 411 on Blake’s Case – or that such a Trial even happened at all!

 

“BUT I DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT BLAKE!”, you assert. “Sorry”, I reply. “But don’t blame me! I do NOT MINIMIZE OR WITHOLD SUCH DATA! I leave that to the CAUCASIAN-CONTROLLED MSM!”

 

More recently there was the White man in Texas, who shot 2 suspected BLACK robbers on his White neighbor’s property and was never even arrested. Even the Police would hold an Investigation if a White Cop shot in the back and killed 2-BLACK “Suspects” – EVEN IN TEXAS! Remember that “Innocent until Proven GUILTY” stuff!

 

Meanwhile back here on Long Island, a Black man shot and killed a drunken young White man, who threatened to kill the Black man’s son. The Black man is out of prison now!

 

             

 

I will NOT publish a photo or Gallery of O. J. Simpson here at this time because we have all been OVERSATURATED with intimate detail about Simpson ever since the murder occurred. Oh yes, O. J.’s ex-wife’s LOVER was also shot and killed.

 

Tabacco does NOT want to be accused of dismissing or ignoring a White person’s disaster the way the Mainstream Media did Robert Blake!

 

 

Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.

 

Tabacco is not a blogger, who thinks; I am a Thinker, who blogs. Speaking Truth to Power!

 

In 1981′s ‘Body Heat’, Kathleen Turner said, “Knowledge is power”.


T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World: WTP = We The People

 

 

www.wyandanch.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org

Subdomain re Exploited Minority Long Island community

 

 

T1610\3544 +Advisory

This entry was posted in Bush, class war, compromise, disaster capitalism, GOP, hypocrisy, knowledge is power, Obama, political ping pong, Politics, socialism4richcapitalism4poor, sophistry, takebackamerica, warpeace and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to “CENTRAL PARK FIVE” (A New Film), 5-Black & Hispanic Youths Exonerated But Never Reimbursed For Up To 13-Years Spent In Prison Re Bogus Police Entrapment & Railroading In The 1989 “Central Park Jogger” Case (“The Crime Of The Century”? – Only Because Those In Charge Thought The Guilty Were BLACK). We’re Talking Here New York, NY, Not New York, Mississippi! Is American Justice Blind Or Just Blindly, Racially Prejudiced! There Were 6-VICTIMS Here, Not Just 1! But Only The 1-White Female Victim Received Special Consideration – The 5-Victims Of Color Got American INJUSTICE As Usual!

  1. Plakakrorne says:

    The next time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as considerably as this 1. I mean, I know it was my selection to read, but I really thought youd have something intriguing to say. All I hear is actually a bunch of whining about some thing that you could fix for those who werent too busy seeking for attention.
    It’s challenging to acquire knowledgeable individuals on this topic, but you sound like you know what you are talking about! Thanks

    [url=http://www.free-blog-site.com/customizednfljerseys]Customized NFL Jerseys[/url]

    http://nfljerseys2012.nichesite.org

    • admin says:

      Plakakrorne:

      I indeed hope my Post was NOT as ambiguous as your Comment! I will let your comment speak for itself! I am certain that most of my Readers will conclude that your Comments are as vacuous and self-serving as you claim my Post is!

      Have a good day,

      Tabacco

  2. Anonymous says:

    Greetings! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one? Thanks a lot! pompy g

    • admin says:

      pompy g:

      Sorry, but I do not!

      Now you know what I’ve known all along – Tabacco is a Thinker and a Blogger, but I am NOT a Computer Nerd. Try doing a Google Search on it!

      Good luck to you!

      Tabacco

  3. Anonymous says:

    In this awesome design of things you actually secure a B+ just for effort. Exactly where you lost me was in all the details. You know, as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more true here. Having said that, permit me reveal to you just what did do the job. The writing is actually very persuasive which is probably why I am making an effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, whilst I can easily see a jumps in reason you make, I am not necessarily sure of how you appear to connect the details which inturn make your conclusion. For the moment I will, no doubt subscribe to your position however wish in the foreseeable future you connect the dots better. wynajem bus

  4. admin says:

    Readers:

    Whenever one attempts to “read” the motives of others, one is always on a slippery slope. Nevertheless, having said that, District Attorneys do it all the time – as do psychiatrists, sociologists and police investigators. So I also try my hand at interpreting “Motive” using 1) History, 2) Probability and 3) PRE (Political Reverse Engineering)

    PRE: Instead of beginning at the beginning and working through to the end, I begin at the Results, assume those Results were attributable to planning, not blind luck, and work backwards to analyze how planning achieved those results.

    A formidable example of that Methodology is endemic to my Post:

    “Are There More Black Men In Jail Or In College?” Is It A Valid Question, And What Was That Question Designed To Do? ‘What Black Men Think’ – Film by Janks Morton
    http://tabacco.t-a-b-a-c-c-o.org/?p=965

    The question above is deliberately prejudicial. It is at once both obvious and subtle. The planning and intellect behind its phrasing could only be deliberate and the purpose vulnerable to Deductive Reasoning.

    The Post here lends itself to PRE equally as well. The secret is in NOT dismissing the obvious simply because it occurred in New York City and NOT in Selma, Alabama! When investigating Political Events you must do 2 things:

    1) Remove prejudices from your mind re “this cannot be true”, and

    2) Everyone concerned is presumed “Guilty” until PROVEN INNOCENT!

    Once you investigate with that mindset, you will see clearly and generally solve your “Motive” research.

    Tabacco

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>